|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Иван Грозный  |
|
|
|
Member |
|
My name means Ivan the terrible in russian |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject:
Re: Muskets....---->Xbows
 Brett3:Muskets beat xbows in melee.
o wow that is so amazing... Muskets beat ANY RI unit in meele (except for RI mercs)... That is pretty much obvious and even noobs know that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Marlonsm  |
|
|
|
Member |
|
Brazil - Where we like illiterate presidents. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject:
Re: Muskets....---->Xbows
Nederlandse Gitaar Held: Its weird that musks will beat xbows in even numbers, yet they take almost the same amount of vs each... 132 VS for a Musketeer and 130 VS for a Crossbowman... weird...
Increasing the xbows range from 12 to 14 would be a good idea, to help them counter more effectively.
giving them more range would be nice, and a indirect nerf to 10/10 rush and Ashis. but they already have 16, so we can't increase much, or else they would nerf FF even more, because one of the biggest advantages of the skirm over the xbow is the 20 range. i think that if xbows got 17 or 18 range, would be enough and i don't think they should increase the skirm range, or else they'd get too close from the longbow, and the LB's uniqueness is the very long range
Download Now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
-
-
|
|
|
|
Subject:
Re: Muskets....---->Xbows
Deadly_shot3: Thank you Nederlandse exactly my point, its kind of stupid to give xbows the advantage against them but yet they still lose in even numbers
I only like to use Xbows if I am using them WITH another unit that attacks in melee. That way the units they are attcking are too busy with the melee units to take down my Xbows.
| | |
|