Age of Empires Forums


  advanced
in


Last post 04-26-2012, 12:43 PM by Dopellsolder. 60 replies.
Page 2 of 5 (61 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Sort Posts:
  •  04-21-2012, 4:55 PM 955385 in reply to 955380
    0xyM0r0n 0xyM0r0n is not online. Last active: 09-25-2013, 10:39 PM
    Member
    USA
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 818
    Last Post: 09-25-2013
    Member Since: 04-25-2011
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages
    Yes, but what did you mean by training still elephants(Ones that do not move just stay there) is there a glitch or something; if not you probably mean training only elephants.

    Tech Enthusiast.
    C++ Programmer
    Java Programmer
    C# Programmer
    I don't play on eso anymore. Gameranger and Hamachi.
  •  04-21-2012, 4:55 PM 955386 in reply to 955380
    Chrissl Chrissl is not online. Last active: 28-12-2013, 5:35 PM
    Member
    Germany/Frankfurt
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 172
    Last Post: 12-28-2013
    Member Since: 06-10-2011
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages

    Advantage: if you play india well, they are very good in heads-up-fight.

    there for you need:

    23 chakrams

    take brits in konsulat and send at 199 pop 3 falks and 6 hussar (while sending these units, make sure you have chakrams out that you dont fall back too much)

    always have the gurkha mansabdar (maybe sepoy mansabdar too) behind your armee on defensive mode

    build tigers as often as possible (built front tc that you can recall your dead explorers fast)

     

    THEN india are very strong and you have a overpop against most civs. they win against ottos, are even with germans and have a chance to hold ports if he doesnt spam mortars like hell. without mansabdar, tigers, chakrams and cannons india sucks in heads up fight ofcourse which is why most people only run with them, very sad imo


    http://www.twitch.tv/agechrissl
  •  04-21-2012, 5:18 PM 955387 in reply to 955386
    LordStefanIII LordStefanIII is not online. Last active: 03/07/2014, 4:07 PM
    Member
    Top 75 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,777
    Last Post: 07-03-2014
    Member Since: 05-28-2010
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages
    Chrissl:

    THEN india are very strong and you have a overpop against most civs. they win against ottos, are even with germans and have a chance to hold ports if he doesnt spam mortars like hell. without mansabdar, tigers, chakrams and cannons india sucks in heads up fight ofcourse which is why most people only run with them, very sad imo

    Lol, Germans are the best 1 vs 1 civ on andes, and somehow every single crap teir 4 civ you name is even with them.

  •  04-21-2012, 5:24 PM 955388 in reply to 955385
    Dopellsolder Dopellsolder is not online. Last active: 09-21-2013, 10:22 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 189
    Last Post: 09-21-2013
    Member Since: 03-09-2012
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages

    skhsri:
    Yes, but what did you mean by training still elephants(Ones that do not move just stay there) is there a glitch or something; if not you probably mean training only elephants.

    Read again. I mean still training elephant. That  isnt feature, its word similar to always.


    ESO name: demonkevin
  •  04-21-2012, 5:38 PM 955390 in reply to 955388
    jayve98 jayve98 is not online. Last active: 10-29-2013, 3:10 PM
    Member
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,189
    Last Post: 10-29-2013
    Member Since: 03-15-2012
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages
    Dopellsolder:

    skhsri:
    Yes, but what did you mean by training still elephants(Ones that do not move just stay there) is there a glitch or something; if not you probably mean training only elephants.

    Read again. I mean still training elephant. That  isnt feature, its word similar to always.

    No. Just admit you're wrong. 


    dcdonnie4:

    The more costeffective army can win vs a more expensive (better unit) because they can just keep throwing them at the other player.

  •  04-21-2012, 6:06 PM 955391 in reply to 955368
    ozn ozn is not online. Last active: 09-14-2013, 10:52 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 199
    Last Post: 09-14-2013
    Member Since: 12-06-2008
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages

    skhsri:
    Hey ozn, ive seen people use flail boxes its so funny; anyways, arent siege elephants tagged as cavalry?

    Not sure 100% but I think they count as both.  Both India'sCav faster train card and China's art train faster card seem to work. They are probably like Albus guns, have duality.

    Ive never seen a flail box, didnt even know u could do it.  They are probably too slow to move.

    Otto and Aztec are probably the only civs India can beat.  Try not to use India in 1v1 they lose vs any Euro civ.  In team games they are really good.  Their inf w/ masabandars are really good.  When u push your opponent to their base, you should probably have a euro teammate make your morts and try to kill any enemy culvs.  Look at fuher/bode's use india.  They are probably the best indias right now.  They get map fast and help their teammates push whenever they can.

    One thing I don't understand with India is camels training slower than elephants in stable.  Zambs can be very effective in certain situations; its a shame they can't be used effectively in game.

  •  04-21-2012, 9:03 PM 955396 in reply to 955391
    Anirko13 Anirko13 is not online. Last active: 02-17-2014, 4:54 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 141
    Last Post: 02-17-2014
    Member Since: 10-09-2011
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages

    Just a thought. it'd be really cheap and lame, but what if u got the brahmins in the eco of ur opponent before he's walled up? you'd be able to keep spamming tigers in his eco endlessly, and when he kills them, you could just wake them up with the explorer glitch (alt+d) and keep on spamming tigers.

    of course, you'd probably get pested from a lot of games :/



    Ryz0n:
    I am not a kindergarten teacher. If you kids can't play nice, I will have to start kicking you out of the classroom.
  •  04-21-2012, 10:12 PM 955398 in reply to 955386
    jeffro18 jeffro18 is not online. Last active: 03-23-2013, 7:40 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 327
    Last Post: 03-23-2013
    Member Since: 04-30-2011
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages
    Chrissl:

    Advantage: if you play india well, they are very good in heads-up-fight.

    there for you need:

    23 chakrams

    take brits in konsulat and send at 199 pop 3 falks and 6 hussar (while sending these units, make sure you have chakrams out that you dont fall back too much)

    always have the gurkha mansabdar (maybe sepoy mansabdar too) behind your armee on defensive mode

    build tigers as often as possible (built front tc that you can recall your dead explorers fast)

     

    THEN india are very strong and you have a overpop against most civs. they win against ottos, are even with germans and have a chance to hold ports if he doesnt spam mortars like hell. without mansabdar, tigers, chakrams and cannons india sucks in heads up fight ofcourse which is why most people only run with them, very sad imo

    How r india and german par/even with each other may i ask!!!

     They cant hold a good port's, 4 mortars pwns india and u cant touch them, only way india wins is running all game and the india having better marco/micro.


    LordStefanIII:
    Damn what kind of response is that? Does it mean you're a virgin?

    Jerom:
    Thanks just what I needed.

    Milky__:
    Wish I could sig this too

    but im afraid i would get banned for being a forum goddess
  •  04-21-2012, 10:15 PM 955399 in reply to 955391
    jeffro18 jeffro18 is not online. Last active: 03-23-2013, 7:40 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 327
    Last Post: 03-23-2013
    Member Since: 04-30-2011
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages
    ozn:

    skhsri:
    Hey ozn, ive seen people use flail boxes its so funny; anyways, arent siege elephants tagged as cavalry?

    Not sure 100% but I think they count as both.  Both India'sCav faster train card and China's art train faster card seem to work. They are probably like Albus guns, have duality.

    Ive never seen a flail box, didnt even know u could do it.  They are probably too slow to move.

    Otto and Aztec are probably the only civs India can beat.  Try not to use India in 1v1 they lose vs any Euro civ.  In team games they are really good.  Their inf w/ masabandars are really good.  When u push your opponent to their base, you should probably have a euro teammate make your morts and try to kill any enemy culvs.  Look at fuher/bode's use india.  They are probably the best indias right now.  They get map fast and help their teammates push whenever they can.

    One thing I don't understand with India is camels training slower than elephants in stable.  Zambs can be very effective in certain situations; its a shame they can't be used effectively in game.

    Asian saloon thing is y ele's train faster, zams only good vs boxs. 

    LordStefanIII:
    Damn what kind of response is that? Does it mean you're a virgin?

    Jerom:
    Thanks just what I needed.

    Milky__:
    Wish I could sig this too

    but im afraid i would get banned for being a forum goddess
  •  04-21-2012, 11:53 PM 955401 in reply to 955399
    knight_br knight_br is not online. Last active: 12-26-2013, 9:16 PM
    Member
    Andes
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,089
    Last Post: 12-26-2013
    Member Since: 12-08-2010
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages

    The biggest disadvantage is dont have mortars.

    And u definitely cant heads up spain or iro.

    Advantages: castles spam for heads up are very good, and have a strong army.


    MTSP_Fuher

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gInNcSiT74w

    http://www.mediafire.com/folder/dtdqjyg99m0r8/RGs_AOE3
  •  04-22-2012, 10:17 AM 955420 in reply to 955387
    Chrissl Chrissl is not online. Last active: 28-12-2013, 5:35 PM
    Member
    Germany/Frankfurt
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 172
    Last Post: 12-28-2013
    Member Since: 06-10-2011
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages
    LordStefanIII:
    Chrissl:

    THEN india are very strong and you have a overpop against most civs. they win against ottos, are even with germans and have a chance to hold ports if he doesnt spam mortars like hell. without mansabdar, tigers, chakrams and cannons india sucks in heads up fight ofcourse which is why most people only run with them, very sad imo

    Lol, Germans are the best 1 vs 1 civ on andes, and somehow every single crap teir 4 civ you name is even with them.

    I am not talking about 1v1 and both players play without nats. Have you ever played (against) india the way i described it? With chakrams, tigers (all the time), mansabdar, and konsulat canons? if not you cant know how strong india can be. most players dont use these abilities so they cant win without running ofcourse. its the same thing with ottos...

    i think i have to play more india and ottos to show you what i mean ;) 


    http://www.twitch.tv/agechrissl
  •  04-22-2012, 10:19 AM 955421 in reply to 955390
    Dopellsolder Dopellsolder is not online. Last active: 09-21-2013, 10:22 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 189
    Last Post: 09-21-2013
    Member Since: 03-09-2012
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages
    jayve98:
    Dopellsolder:

    skhsri:
    Yes, but what did you mean by training still elephants(Ones that do not move just stay there) is there a glitch or something; if not you probably mean training only elephants.

    Read again. I mean still training elephant. That  isnt feature, its word similar to always.

    No. Just admit you're wrong. 

    Youre wrong man. You just dont know what STILL means dude. 


    ESO name: demonkevin
  •  04-22-2012, 10:24 AM 955422 in reply to 955421
    Dopellsolder Dopellsolder is not online. Last active: 09-21-2013, 10:22 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 189
    Last Post: 09-21-2013
    Member Since: 03-09-2012
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages

    Yore annoying. Still disagree with me.

    If I say : In AOE are trees, youll reply ARE U SERIOUS??!!! 


    ESO name: demonkevin
  •  04-22-2012, 1:49 PM 955434 in reply to 955422
    Anirko13 Anirko13 is not online. Last active: 02-17-2014, 4:54 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 141
    Last Post: 02-17-2014
    Member Since: 10-09-2011
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages
    you don't use still like that :/


    Ryz0n:
    I am not a kindergarten teacher. If you kids can't play nice, I will have to start kicking you out of the classroom.
  •  04-22-2012, 1:55 PM 955435 in reply to 955420
    LordStefanIII LordStefanIII is not online. Last active: 03/07/2014, 4:07 PM
    Member
    Top 75 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,777
    Last Post: 07-03-2014
    Member Since: 05-28-2010
    Subject: Re: Indian advantages and disadvantages
    Chrissl:

    I am not talking about 1v1 and both players play without nats. Have you ever played (against) india the way i described it? With chakrams, tigers (all the time), mansabdar, and konsulat canons? if not you cant know how strong india can be. most players dont use these abilities so they cant win without running ofcourse. its the same thing with ottos...

    i think i have to play more india and ottos to show you what i mean ;) 

    I've played vs dans India, and I have to saw he did very good, the best I've ever seen India played. But still they aren't as good as Germans lol.

Page 2 of 5 (61 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML