AOE3 Forums

Personally i tink this whole idea for ww1 and ww2 is stupid.

think about it your units would die with oe shot of a gun now days and even 50 years ago.

when you get to around the 1940's u will be able to access atomic bombs and only three will wipe out a whole civilization.

and talk about lag. Air planes, huge naval ships of different types, and all the other stuff that comes with it.

and it would ruin everything aoe has become and its reputation aoe3 is awesome and they dont need to flush it down the toilet.

i think a remake or earlier of aoe1 or 2 would be great.

Dude from what your saying.

A hit from 2 - 3 arrows kills a person indefinatly

and a shot from a musketeer kills a person

a hit from a cannon kills a person weather on a horse or standing. 

all in AOE 3.

The culverin is somehow the best at killing ship's when mortars can't kill infantry .

ESO made those happen to make the flipping game.

IT'S NOT REALISTIC IN THE FAST THAT REAL PEOPLE CAN DO OR TAKE THAT MUCH HIT'S DAMAGE OR EXPLOSIONS 

=.= 

Ichigo1uk:

Dude from what your saying.

A hit from 2 - 3 arrows kills a person indefinatly

and a shot from a musketeer kills a person

a hit from a cannon kills a person weather on a horse or standing. 

all in AOE 3.

The culverin is somehow the best at killing ship's when mortars can't kill infantry .

ESO made those happen to make the flipping game.

IT'S NOT REALISTIC IN THE FAST THAT REAL PEOPLE CAN DO OR TAKE THAT MUCH HIT'S DAMAGE OR EXPLOSIONS 

=.= 

It's a game man.

Sriharsha1:

Ichigo1uk:

Dude from what your saying.

A hit from 2 - 3 arrows kills a person indefinatly

and a shot from a musketeer kills a person

a hit from a cannon kills a person weather on a horse or standing. 

all in AOE 3.

The culverin is somehow the best at killing ship's when mortars can't kill infantry .

ESO made those happen to make the flipping game.

IT'S NOT REALISTIC IN THE FACT THAT REAL PEOPLE CAN DO OR TAKE THAT MUCH HIT'S DAMAGE OR EXPLOSIONS 

=.= 

 

It's a game man.

I kno which is why i said they really can't take that much explosions or getting shot at in AOE 3 yet the other dude expects everyone to die in one shot in AOE 4  

=.= 

Kedric11:

Personally i tink this whole idea for ww1 and ww2 is stupid.

think about it your units would die with oe shot of a gun now days and even 50 years ago.

when you get to around the 1940's u will be able to access atomic bombs and only three will wipe out a whole civilization.

and talk about lag. Air planes, huge naval ships of different types, and all the other stuff that comes with it.

and it would ruin everything aoe has become and its reputation aoe3 is awesome and they dont need to flush it down the toilet.

i think a remake or earlier of aoe1 or 2 would be great.

True, soldiers in real life can take a lot less punishment than an AoE military unit. But this is a computer game and if units in all other RTS games can survive multiple shots, then a World Wars game would be no different. But, to make up for this, the base population limit could be increased. There might also be less lag with a better graphics engine if the new game uses one.

The new graphics engine would probably be able to handle ships, planes, and increased troop counts.

And, atomic bombs would be nearly impossible to include as they would ruin the strategy that it takes to play an RTS game. The only place one might be included is the single player campaign, at the very end. Otherwise, I agree about that.

Of course, another ancient or medieval game would be great, but not before ES has covered all parts of human history at least once. Then, after that it can start revisiting time periods. Although I'd be happy if ES didn't cover anything post-WWII.

AceKiller14:

If it was about WWII, I would love to see Chinese women being (definition= forced to have sex) by Japanese soldiers.

And Germany would be the most "OP" civilization.

France should be more "UP" than in AoE3.

U.S. should be added.

And what else...

how would germany be the most OP civ if the US was mass producing more resources then all of the axis powers and all there allies put together by the end of the war? 

Ichigo1uk:

Sriharsha1:

Ichigo1uk:

Dude from what your saying.

A hit from 2 - 3 arrows kills a person indefinatly

and a shot from a musketeer kills a person

a hit from a cannon kills a person weather on a horse or standing. 

all in AOE 3.

The culverin is somehow the best at killing ship's when mortars can't kill infantry .

ESO made those happen to make the flipping game.

IT'S NOT REALISTIC IN THE FACT THAT REAL PEOPLE CAN DO OR TAKE THAT MUCH HIT'S DAMAGE OR EXPLOSIONS 

=.= 

 

It's a game man.

I kno which is why i said they really can't take that much explosions or getting shot at in AOE 3 yet the other dude expects everyone to die in one shot in AOE 4  

=.= 

And very..or extremely hard.

It would be impossible to attack a group of 50 infantry with another group of infantry. It's realistic in real life but it would be stupid to put in a RTS game.

Kedric11:

 

think about it your units would die with oe shot of a gun now days and even 50 years ago.

A game in which units die from a single shot is perfectly possibleand can be as good as one like AoE, in which units die from several shots.

If you don´t believe me, play American Conquest. A cannon kills ANY (and I mean ANY, no exception) infantry unit. A mushket shot kills most soldiers, with the exception of long range shots or firing against units using armor.

Von Richardsen:

Kedric11:

 

think about it your units would die with oe shot of a gun now days and even 50 years ago.

 

A game in which units die from a single shot is perfectly possible and can be as good as one like AoE, in which units die from several shots.

If you don´t believe me, play American Conquest. A cannon kills ANY (and I mean ANY, no exception) infantry unit. A mushket shot kills most soldiers, with the exception of long range shots or firing against units using armor.

 

 

A game like this can definitely be good but is just not in the AoE style. The only way this would make sense is if the population limit were greatly raised for a world wars game.