|
|
Last post 11-03-2009, 5:39 PM by Rezarecshun. 65 replies.
-
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
max2h  |
|
|
|
Member |
|
around the bend, eating a ricola. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject:
Re: Ok Everyone Easiest Civ?
Oddball the Angry: Solmyr: Why do you think british is the easiest? I don´t see that point, because you need a decent cowboom to get a great eco. I don´t understand why they should be easy for beginners. In my opinion easiest civs are France (because they don´t need to much tactical knowledge to get a decent score and a got military as a beginner) and Ottoman (because you don´t need to train villiager. When I started playin AoE training villager was one of my biggest Problems :-) )
It was just my opinion, I guess it was because I picked them up easily myself. Japs are easy for new players but they would never find an online game that allows them.
Cowboom is easy with brits, and manor houses can give you lots of extra settlers to chop wood, which will give you more mills and plantations. They have most of the ECO mill and plantation gathering cards, and have the estate homecity card. This will give you serious boom later on in the game as you can train 20 villagers at once, and it only takes the time of 2 villagers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hidan  |
|
|
|
Member |
|
The USA, where we ride the bandwagon to school. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject:
Re: Ok Everyone Easiest Civ?
max2h:Cowboom is easy with brits, and manor houses can give you lots of extra settlers to chop wood, which will give you more mills and plantations. They have most of the ECO mill and plantation gathering cards, and have the estate homecity card. This will give you serious boom later on in the game as you can train 20 villagers at once, and it only takes the time of 2 villagers.
Why you would use several mills with the brits is beyond me. MAYBE 1 or two. Cowbooming and doing manors at the same time isn't easy to perfect, and fighting with ports is way easier.
ditissparta:men i was only trying to make coonverstion and then u say that i am gay. man i do nice u say im gay men.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
max2h  |
|
|
|
Member |
|
around the bend, eating a ricola. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject:
Re: Ok Everyone Easiest Civ?
I like to split up my settlers between building manors and hunting. I dedicate 4 or 3 of my vills to wood and 1 or 2 of my vills to hunting. I train settlers from my tc to go to hunting. I cow boom later in the game, once I have enough food to train both vills and sheep. 20 minutes into the game I should have all 20 manor houses, and I am working my way through the rest of the wood on my side. When My sheep start to hit the 100s, take like 5 vills from my hunting group and harvest those sheep. When all game is gone, I recall my hunters, eliminate any 100% fattened sheep, and start farming. When my coin group is gone, I build some plantations, or I use some of them to wood, and eventually take them to the plantations as well as part of my original lumber group. I aim for 56 pop on plantations and 35 pop on mills, with the remaining 9 vills, I harvest sheep. I build enough livestock pens to be able to quickly fatten all my sheep at once. Once the game begins, I pay less attention to the livestock pens. If I have a very high food supply, I will return to the mills with those 9 villagers and focus 95% on my military and fighting. I set my factories on wood, or rockets depending on the enemy's civ and tactics. This will give me a stable supply of wood, as I might loose some buildings, but I'm not constantly training wood. If I need to train Longbow-men, I see if there is another way to attack the enemy, with maybe artillery, or I use my market. Usually I have enough wood If I need LB men. I make sure I have enough wood to quickly rebuild an economy If its damaged badly. I use estates to retrain the vills, and my remaining wood to rebuild the economy. Also, If I don't use much wood, the factories really boost your wood amount. This strategy has not failed me yet. What I face, is problems with my military, once the treaty or half map split is over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: Ok Everyone Easiest Civ?
i don´t think brit eco rocks with just sheep... and against a decent fighter your economy might collapse if you just have mills and plants with brits or am i wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: Ok Everyone Easiest Civ?
Ports --> easier to manage then brits in the beginning, like alan said they are basically dragoons,cassadores with artillery in the rear. Brits on the other hand need more micromanagment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: Ok Everyone Easiest Civ?
predatorfreak:Non-op, Portugal. Op, France. India and British are two of the hardest non-ops to really become absolutely outstanding with and compete very effectively. Because of this, Brits are seeing something of a resurgence in the top-tier right now, Alan, Sanderson, The British-Laming Wonderkid (anyone who plays at high levels knows who this is) , etc all have very very good Brits, hell mine aren't too shabby either.
Fix'd Lawl jokes, your brits are ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: Ok Everyone Easiest Civ?
Too fix it right you'd have to change the comma to a period, nooblet. In addition, to the person claiming a truly excellent British boom is easy, bull-fruiting-shite. The British boom is one of the most attention-demanding in the entire game, only Iroquois demands more attention in fact. Pulling it off properly, achieving a good score and keeping your eco going while you fight is harder than it looks for British..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
Page 3 of 5 (66 items)
3
|
|
|