Age of Empires Forums


  advanced
in


Last post 07-13-2012, 5:05 PM by Milky__. 68 replies.
Page 3 of 5 (69 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Sort Posts:
  •  07-03-2012, 5:29 PM 960703 in reply to 960701
    hayabusa_ryu hayabusa_ryu is not online. Last active: 10-18-2013, 3:55 PM
    Member
    India
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 48
    Last Post: 10-18-2013
    Member Since: 06-29-2011
    Subject: Re: Sioux score

    Yes, You're right Milky. I also realized that long time ago. But problem with making dog box is that u loose map control. Either u make dog box or not, it doesn't affect the boom by a big margin. 

    And all my recent score are without Dog box. 


    Looks like it's TIME TO KILL!
  •  07-03-2012, 6:03 PM 960707 in reply to 960703
    jayve98 jayve98 is not online. Last active: 10-29-2013, 3:10 PM
    Member
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,189
    Last Post: 10-29-2013
    Member Since: 03-15-2012
    Subject: Re: Sioux score
    hayabusa_ryu:

    Yes, You're right Milky. I also realized that long time ago. But problem with making dog box is that u loose map control. Either u make dog box or not, it doesn't affect the boom by a big margin. 

    And all my recent score are without Dog box. 

    u LOSE map control with dog box? so the otherteams whole entire military might is focused on killing ur box, ur team decides to just sit around waiting for the enemy to start fbing all over u? whenever i do a dog box my team has almost concrete map control by the time im finished. even if u just start running around with ur box and u keep them chasing u then ur team wil have even more time to fb. a dog box will help u obtaion map control a lot 


    dcdonnie4:

    The more costeffective army can win vs a more expensive (better unit) because they can just keep throwing them at the other player.

  •  07-03-2012, 6:25 PM 960708 in reply to 960707
    Milky__ Milky__ is not online. Last active: Tue, Dec 17 2013, 7:26 PM
    Member
    NZ
    Top 25 Contributor
    Total Posts: 4,974
    Last Post: 12-17-2013
    Member Since: 08-19-2009
    Subject: Re: Sioux score

    You don't lose map control with making a dog box. You get to 199/200 pop, then send the 14 wakina card. you send your dog box one way, spam teepees at their walls at another point, then run your dog box to those teepees. 

    Or, if you know you aren't going to get in, maybe make 20 wakina and double with your ally in the natives. that should almost make it gg. 

  •  07-04-2012, 10:32 AM 960734 in reply to 960708
    TacticalWillie TacticalWillie is not online. Last active: 12-26-2013, 9:58 AM
    Member
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 690
    Last Post: 12-26-2013
    Member Since: 05-29-2012
    Subject: Re: Sioux score

    if you know you aren't getting in with the Sioux dogbox then just use there OP horsees and take out all there starting armies that will set them back so far it will allow your allies to build fwd right up at there walls and obviously once you get to someones walls its pretty much gg, since they know they'll never get rid of the OP Sioux teepees and OP wakina skirms and OP rr that are right in front and supported by an port allow with OP mortars


    RainbowZ:
    TacticalWillie should stop noobbashing colonels.
  •  07-04-2012, 5:00 PM 960763 in reply to 960599
    Katsu-S~S Katsu-S~S is not online. Last active: 03-18-2014, 9:50 PM
    Member
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 406
    Last Post: 03-18-2014
    Member Since: 03-01-2012
    Subject: Re: Sioux score
    Milky__:

    Grandevous:
    yeah i was doing a dog box. i guess andes suck for sioux cause of the lack of abundance of hunts.

    I disagree.

    There have been many games where I have been sioux in a 2v2 and have hit passed 1600 as there were mountains of hunts (with a port ally), It's just too unpredictable. 

    Deccan sucks for sioux because of the map.  

    did _pi have a youtube vid with him as sioux what was hisscore?
  •  07-04-2012, 7:01 PM 960772 in reply to 960763
    jayve98 jayve98 is not online. Last active: 10-29-2013, 3:10 PM
    Member
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,189
    Last Post: 10-29-2013
    Member Since: 03-15-2012
    Subject: Re: Sioux score
    wakina is the core of any sioux that has any knowledge of how to play the civ whatsoever

    dcdonnie4:

    The more costeffective army can win vs a more expensive (better unit) because they can just keep throwing them at the other player.

  •  07-04-2012, 8:57 PM 960786 in reply to 960772
    0xyM0r0n 0xyM0r0n is not online. Last active: 09-25-2013, 10:39 PM
    Member
    USA
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 818
    Last Post: 09-25-2013
    Member Since: 04-25-2011
    Subject: Re: Sioux score

    about a year ago i played against a sioux player who got almost 2000(1940 - something) score at 40 minutes i saw his deck and there were no score-boost cards(heavy fortifications, BB) he was using the ranching card, i believe and he apparently got 70k food

    He also claims to be a general... does anyone know this guy

    It was on orinoco as well, so no sea boom


    Tech Enthusiast.
    C++ Programmer
    Java Programmer
    C# Programmer
    I don't play on eso anymore. Gameranger and Hamachi.
  •  07-04-2012, 10:08 PM 960791 in reply to 960786
    Milky__ Milky__ is not online. Last active: Tue, Dec 17 2013, 7:26 PM
    Member
    NZ
    Top 25 Contributor
    Total Posts: 4,974
    Last Post: 12-17-2013
    Member Since: 08-19-2009
    Subject: Re: Sioux score
    an eso name would be cool
  •  07-05-2012, 12:57 AM 960812 in reply to 960791
    jayve98 jayve98 is not online. Last active: 10-29-2013, 3:10 PM
    Member
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,189
    Last Post: 10-29-2013
    Member Since: 03-15-2012
    Subject: Re: Sioux score

    Milky__:
    an eso name would be cool

    +1 and ive heard that sioux cowing gets u like 15K more food but i havent had the time to test it. since the farm upgrades make livestock fatten faster and improve gather rate for the mtoo 


    dcdonnie4:

    The more costeffective army can win vs a more expensive (better unit) because they can just keep throwing them at the other player.

  •  07-05-2012, 7:24 AM 960832 in reply to 960812
    Magnam Magnam is not online. Last active: 09-02-2014, 10:49 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 226
    Last Post: 09-02-2014
    Member Since: 05-15-2012
    Subject: Re: Sioux score

    My highest score was 1800 with cows +brit cow team card and an indian trade team mate.

    I traded arround 80k food and had arround 19k - 20k wood.


    Da_bawwss:
    My rank is stuck on 0, I am a very skilled player but this gets me kick out of every game.
  •  07-05-2012, 7:26 AM 960833 in reply to 960832
    Milky__ Milky__ is not online. Last active: Tue, Dec 17 2013, 7:26 PM
    Member
    NZ
    Top 25 Contributor
    Total Posts: 4,974
    Last Post: 12-17-2013
    Member Since: 08-19-2009
    Subject: Re: Sioux score
    not bad
  •  07-05-2012, 12:48 PM 960862 in reply to 960833
    StormComing StormComing is not online. Last active: 01-26-2014, 12:21 PM
    Member
    Top 100 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,474
    Last Post: 01-26-2014
    Member Since: 07-26-2010
    Subject: Re: Sioux score

    if you ever face someone good when ur using sioux , and you make a dog box, u will lose map control, guaranteed unless you mix things up and do some weird unconventional sh** with your partner.

     

    cuzz the european civ in charge of defennding vs the sioux will be filling his main pop with goons to deal with box, and tthenn he/she will have overpop to deal with wakina/ double with temate/kill the sioux parterns fb vils.   you have 0 map control wiith a sioux player ingame.

     

    the only thing that can get you map control as sioux aas  far as i know, is doing sstuff like..... bothe the sioux and his mate pushinng ttogehter in nats, or have the mate wall  off the nnats and then pussh with the siioux outsside the cliffs.  but both those options work situationally and have huge possibilities of backfiring loll.

     

    sioux just suck havent had a problem vs them sincei l2p

    pps on my phone so SRY FR TYPOS


    RIP AGE COM
  •  07-05-2012, 1:08 PM 960863 in reply to 960862
    StormComing StormComing is not online. Last active: 01-26-2014, 12:21 PM
    Member
    Top 100 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,474
    Last Post: 01-26-2014
    Member Since: 07-26-2010
    Subject: Re: Sioux score

    if people want dog boxes to breach walls they need to start sending a bunch of skirms along with the box to kill the goons.  no running around the map nonsense just a quick push into the base.   dogs alone are never gonna breach walls +goons.

     

    lets evolve ppl and play smarterrrr no meta sheep plz k thx


    RIP AGE COM
  •  07-05-2012, 4:32 PM 960872 in reply to 960863
    Milky__ Milky__ is not online. Last active: Tue, Dec 17 2013, 7:26 PM
    Member
    NZ
    Top 25 Contributor
    Total Posts: 4,974
    Last Post: 12-17-2013
    Member Since: 08-19-2009
    Subject: Re: Sioux score

    but the dog soldiers look so fearsome that dragoons lose all taste for battle and run away

    worked every time for me 

  •  07-05-2012, 4:37 PM 960874 in reply to 960832
    jayve98 jayve98 is not online. Last active: 10-29-2013, 3:10 PM
    Member
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,189
    Last Post: 10-29-2013
    Member Since: 03-15-2012
    Subject: Re: Sioux score
    Magnam:

    My highest score was 1800 with cows +brit cow team card and an indian trade team mate.

    I traded arround 80k food and had arround 19k - 20k wood.

    when u cow as sioux do u make any sheep? also would it just be a refular boom, just once ur in imp make ur cows/sheep, possibly adjust ur distro a bit? 


    dcdonnie4:

    The more costeffective army can win vs a more expensive (better unit) because they can just keep throwing them at the other player.

Page 3 of 5 (69 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML