AOE3 Forums

   advanced
in


Last post 04-30-2008, 11:37 AM by [GuitarHeroNinja]. 17 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (18 items)   1 2 Next >
Sort Posts:
  •  10-13-2006, 1:17 AM 325611
    CpL FoLeY CpL FoLeY is not online. Last active: 10/23/2006, 7:42 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 34
    Last Post: 10-23-2006
    Member Since: 10-05-2006
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    This treaty thihng could acctually be the biggest problem ever i mean all you have to do is play rush, get masses of armies into their base (before they wall) and keep upgrading them! then as soon as the treaty is over...BAM there base is gone.


    CPL FOLEY.
  •  10-13-2006, 7:15 AM 325705 in reply to 325611
    swinehoot swinehoot is not online. Last active: 06/28/2008, 11:37 PM
    Member
    Top 75 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,562
    Last Post: 06-28-2008
    Member Since: 08-11-2006
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    Posted by: CpL FoLeY
    This treaty thihng could acctually be the biggest problem ever i mean all you have to do is play rush, get masses of armies into their base (before they wall) and keep upgrading them! then as soon as the treaty is over...BAM there base is gone.


    CPL FOLEY.


    You would be behind with your economy, your opponent would know your army, and they could completly circle your army, meaning you would lose real bad. If you spread them out they can kill them with strategic towers. And while 100 pop army is in thier base, they can have 50 for defending thiers, and 50 attacking, where your army would have been, or since they would already have enough resources, they could wipe out your base more sucessfully than you could do to thiers, resulting in a loss for the rush. Finally and most importnatly, alot of nr games are half map, and most if not all players who i play in nr are not looking for a cheap strat, they want a fair game.
  •  10-14-2006, 9:47 AM 326778 in reply to 325705
    GameOver GameOver is not online. Last active: 02/23/2007, 9:24 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 145
    Last Post: 02-23-2007
    Member Since: 12-26-2005
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    Your right, most people want a fair game, but also most people cheat.

    ES should of made the treaty games half map, that way you even have peace of mind, but they fell short on this one i think.
  •  10-14-2006, 4:30 PM 327135 in reply to 326778
    Gus1236 Gus1236 is not online. Last active: 06/16/2008, 5:47 PM
    Member
    3rd rock from the sun
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 322
    Last Post: 06-16-2008
    Member Since: 09-26-2006
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    some peopl only want the rule of no rush so adding half map might make some peopl who don't like that rule be wishing there is a rule that only has no rush. so making it just one rule wasint that bad of a idea i think.




    ps. there are maps that have no rush and half map. you can download them at agecommuinity.com.
    Posted by: GameOver
    Your right, most people want a fair game, but also most people cheat.

    ES should of made the treaty games half map, that way you even have peace of mind, but they fell short on this one i think.
    Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it -Winston Churchill
  •  10-15-2006, 3:45 AM 327497 in reply to 327135
    Kyndig Kyndig is not online. Last active: 08/29/2007, 6:31 AM
    Member
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 469
    Last Post: 08-29-2007
    Member Since: 01-31-2006
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    Those maps suck, because you get no PR or xp for playing on them. So they suck.

    Peace

    quote]Posted by: Gus1236
    some peopl only want the rule of no rush so adding half map might make some peopl who don't like that rule be wishing there is a rule that only has no rush. so making it just one rule wasint that bad of a idea i think.




    ps. there are maps that have no rush and half map. you can download them at agecommuinity.com.
    Posted by: GameOver
    Your right, most people want a fair game, but also most people cheat.

    ES should of made the treaty games half map, that way you even have peace of mind, but they fell short on this one i think.
  •  10-16-2006, 11:26 AM 328356 in reply to 327497
    GameOver GameOver is not online. Last active: 02/23/2007, 9:24 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 145
    Last Post: 02-23-2007
    Member Since: 12-26-2005
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    A tick box for the half map rule is all thats needed......
  •  10-16-2006, 9:39 PM 328748 in reply to 328356
    johnny23 johnny23 is not online. Last active: 12/23/2006, 6:14 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 70
    Last Post: 12-23-2006
    Member Since: 08-25-2006
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    yeah pretty simple...
    Posted by: GameOver
    A tick box for the half map rule is all thats needed......
    [Edited on 10/16/2006]
  •  10-16-2006, 9:47 PM 328754 in reply to 328748
    purplekiller purplekiller is not online. Last active: 05/17/2007, 11:01 PM
    Member
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 883
    Last Post: 05-17-2007
    Member Since: 09-20-2006
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    sandy said that towers would shoot military units if they come into range. also if they come in to early then you will be able to counter whatever they have pretty easily
  •  10-17-2006, 3:01 PM 329129 in reply to 328754
    YellowSnow YellowSnow is not online. Last active: 01/13/2008, 11:43 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 16
    Last Post: 01-13-2008
    Member Since: 03-09-2006
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    This treaty thihng could acctually be the biggest problem ever i mean all you have to do is play rush, get masses of armies into their base (before they wall) and keep upgrading them! then as soon as the treaty is over...BAM there base is gone.


    Only problem with that thinking is that most good NR players dont leave it to the last minute to create an army....example being a typical NR40 game -- most good players will max out their pop well before 35 in addition to having over the pop limit due to church upgrades and native indians...so while u play a rush strat and have a limited econ, a NR'r will have ur army in his base ready to be elimiated and have an army outside your base....

    another thing - most NR civs aside from maybe Dutch, have good enough econs to rebuild at least another 2 full armies even AFTER their eco has been wiped out, so while your base and his are both wiped out, the NR player will have sufficient resources to continue on....

    Also and this is only my opinion based on the NR decks of known rushers that I've looked at that rushers/normal gamers generally have no clue about eco upgrades - reason - they dont have to normally worry about it
  •  10-19-2006, 3:59 PM 330650 in reply to 329129
    zippEd zippEd is not online. Last active: 12/25/2006, 5:12 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 25
    Last Post: 12-25-2006
    Member Since: 10-19-2006
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    wall in asap :) than you dont have that problem
  •  10-22-2006, 3:42 PM 333899 in reply to 330650
    [Proud]Teutonic [Proud]Teutonic is not online. Last active: 08/29/2008, 9:55 PM
    Member
    Connecticut
    Top 75 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,452
    Last Post: 08-29-2008
    Member Since: 12-14-2005
    Subject: Isnt it so simple
    Posted by: zippEd
    wall in asap :) than you dont have that problem


    it seems like you think walls are invinsible

    well i could jus bring in 5 mortors and bubi!

    -Teutonic

    Teutonic pride all the way!
    nihil nisi Preastantia
  •  02-01-2007, 10:41 AM 420313 in reply to 333899
    fire444