AOE3 Forums


  advanced
in


Last post 08-24-2007, 2:23 PM by ES_WaCkO_. 27 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (28 items)   < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts:
  •  08-23-2007, 1:30 PM 546906 in reply to 546838
    Arctic Arctic is not online. Last active: 12/10/2007, 7:55 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 84
    Last Post: 12-10-2007
    Member Since: 09-30-2005
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF

    El_tres:
    This strat is garbage. The 4 or 5 horses you send will die to pikes, or be a waste of a shipment if the enemy has any skill at all.

     

    Funny thing about Axe Riders, they can actually run away if you are skilled enough to keep an eye on them while you raid.  There a ton of good German players out there who manage to keep Uhlans alive, so why shouldn't Sioux players be able to do the same?

  •  08-23-2007, 5:44 PM 547139 in reply to 546892
    iGiuL iGiuL is not online. Last active: 11/12/2008, 6:36 AM
    Member
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 328
    Last Post: 11-12-2008
    Member Since: 04-08-2006
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF
    Also, if you are going for a semi FF imo its better to send 4 AR -> 700 coin whilst getting a stable + 5 AR or a hut +5-10 clubs. 700coin -> 700 wood is also nice, get 2 tps and 2 huts and spam shipments ^_^
  •  08-23-2007, 6:59 PM 547188 in reply to 546881
    sandstorm sandstorm is not online. Last active: 23/11/2008, 8:25 AM
    Member
    Top 75 Contributor
    Total Posts: 1,627
    Last Post: 11-23-2008
    Member Since: 10-02-2005
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF
    MosheLevi:
    El_tres:

    This strat is garbage.

    Garbage? Shame on you, show some respect.

     

    You should be grateful that Wacko is taking his time to post strategies and communicate with the community.

    Comments like this one will only discourage Ensemble employees from communicating with us.

    And then later on forumers like you will complain that Ensemble is not communicating enough with its fans.

     

    In any case, Wacko is one of the best players out there so you should take his comments seriously.

     

    i agree with that. all though i think that posting a strat that no one can try for themselfs yet is a bad idea. it could be a great strat but even you must admit the strat didn't seem to special.

    and to el_tres, wacko gets paided alot to play aoe3 and talk in these forums, he has a hard job to do and the east you could do is show some respect. it must beterribly hardwork to go through all those pages of patch change suggestion ideas (i guess thats what this forum is for) and deciding what to change. he lets you do your job so let him do his.



    My Scenarios (click pic)
  •  08-23-2007, 9:59 PM 547293 in reply to 545887
    ZetRoC ZetRoC is not online. Last active: 09-04-2007, 9:45 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 4
    Last Post: 09-04-2007
    Member Since: 08-24-2007
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF
    ES_WaCkO_:
    • Once you gain the upper hand put as many villagers as you can afford on the Fire Pit for either Attack Dance or LAME Siege Dance.

     

     

    :@ no wonder your always stubborn about not realizing how Ovah Powad siege dance is, . . u support sioux! . . . ur one of them!!

     

    but seriously at least make it so siege dance don't effect Axe Riders or Dog Soldiers . . . while u have you army attacking and being owned by lame Wakinas spam; (which i wont ßitch about right now) you're also having your wall killed in by 4 torches then ur tc housing all of your garrisoned villagers dead within 5 seconds (and thats with only like 15-20 cavalry!) seriously either make it so Siege dance don't effect the siege on Town Center's or make it so it don't effect Axe Rider/ Dog Soldier as much :@  


    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
  •  08-24-2007, 1:05 AM 547421 in reply to 547293
    Lucas-san Lucas-san is not online. Last active: 10-04-2008, 8:58 PM
    Member
    Londrina, PR, Brazil
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 940
    Last Post: 04-10-2008
    Member Since: 08-24-2007
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF

    Fire dance is balanced, the Sioux doesn't have walls neither cannons, so nerfing it would imbalance them... 

     


    My YouTube channel

  •  08-24-2007, 1:09 AM 547427 in reply to 547421
    Little_Neddy Little_Neddy is not online. Last active: 09-01-2007, 12:30 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 159
    Last Post: 09-01-2007
    Member Since: 08-21-2007
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF

    I agree that would be a bad thing to do.  I already don't like the suiox because of their lack of cannon.  By the way, I have never liked the fire pit.  I think they should just increase the villie productions and have some better siege unit

    NOt like that would ever happen though 




  •  08-24-2007, 10:38 AM 547657 in reply to 547427
    Smear Smear is not online. Last active: 11/22/2007, 10:31 AM
    Member
    Minnesota
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 850
    Last Post: 11-22-2007
    Member Since: 04-15-2006
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF

    Nerfing siege dance would be a very dumb thing to do, Sioux lack seige as it is, and your saying make it so that some of their main "seige" units like axe/dog's should not be affected by it?? Tell me what happens then when the so called "lame" wakina *which are not lame* die at the front and the axe are still trying to break through hmm?

     Now if you say that the wakina wont lose then whats the problem with seige dance? if you lose to the wakina then you've lost the game anyway and the axe are just speeding up the process :-P

     If siege dance is nerfed, sioux should be compensated in some way, like an upgrade in industrial for tashunke or some type of wall becoming available.

     @Ned, tashunke are basically the sioux's "cannon" With their Aoe attack and the fact that they can inflict heavy damage in a matter of seconds, and they basically cost the same as a cannon.


    Sioux Strats
  •  08-24-2007, 11:47 AM 547710 in reply to 547657
    Walker_5 Walker_5 is not online. Last active: 07/02/2008, 5:16 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 118
    Last Post: 07-02-2008
    Member Since: 01-08-2006
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF

    What is the general idea to post a strat in the balance forum when there are a strat forum as well?!


  •  08-24-2007, 12:00 PM 547719 in reply to 547710
    ZetRoC ZetRoC is not online. Last active: 09-04-2007, 9:45 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 4
    Last Post: 09-04-2007
    Member Since: 08-24-2007
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF
    Smear . . . -_- you're not allowed to discuss here because your opinion is bias towards the Sioux because its the only civ you're good at playing. ;p

    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
    NERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCENERFFIREDANCE
  •  08-24-2007, 12:21 PM 547737 in reply to 547719
    Smear Smear is not online. Last active: 11/22/2007, 10:31 AM
    Member
    Minnesota
    Top 150 Contributor
    Total Posts: 850
    Last Post: 11-22-2007
    Member Since: 04-15-2006
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF

    ZetRoC:
    Smear . . . -_- you're not allowed to discuss here because your opinion is bias towards the Sioux because its the only civ you're good at playing. ;p

     

    On the Contrary, Since i play sioux alot i can prove why seige dance should not be nerfed.


    Sioux Strats
  •  08-24-2007, 2:06 PM 547808 in reply to 547719
    Little_Neddy Little_Neddy is not online. Last active: 09-01-2007, 12:30 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 159
    Last Post: 09-01-2007
    Member Since: 08-21-2007
    Subject: Re: Sioux Aggressive FF

    ZetRoC:
    Smear . . . -_- you're not allowed to discuss here because your opinion is bias towards the Sioux because its the only civ you're good at playing. ;p

    This is like saying NASA shouldn't be allowed to talk about rocket scince, because they're good at it.  It doesn't make any sense 




  •  08-24-2007, 2:21 PM 547814 in reply to 547808