AOE3 Forums

GeneralN20:

WOOT!!!! IVAN! IVAN! IVAN!

Lol. He whooped you big time there Cosmic. Good job Ivan.

When did I say that they were more technologically advanced and greater than the Moors?

A while back you mocked my usage of language. The sentenced you posted in regards to this statement was completely badly structured. As such, your meaning was distorted--hence what I understood.

Write better sentences so that I may understand you.

You post an emoticon because you have nothing to say.

True, I don't have words other than insults for stupid comments. I was taught to best not say anything than to mention bad things, thus I post the face.

it's been noted that the Siege of Tenochtitlan was the longest ongoing battle in history.

DUDE! Nobody can fight ongoingly for a month; neither can they do it in a day.

Stop posting LIES!!!

There is no proof that the Inca bested them at anything.

Lol. You just have to use common sense, something which you apparently lack.

Rise of Nations got it pretty damn well, giving the Inca extremely weak units and giving the Aztec the upper-hand of the Pre-Columbian nations

Lol. Civilization is much more historically accurate.

Sid Meier is one of the best game designers in the world, he makes the Civilization games, and he focuses on historical factualness and good gameplay. Some Civilizations are weaker than others, but that's just how it really was.

The Incas, in the game, are one of the most powerful civilizations.

Exactly, you have no proof that they were more technolically advanced.

That's only why Tlatelolco was one of the most remarkable cities/markets to ever exist, right?

Lololololololol.

Lesson: Tlatelolco was made by the Aztecs as a separate (small) city. It was soon absorded into Tenochtitlan and made a district within it.

By the time it became "remarkable" it was no longer an independent city, it was a district within Tenochtitlan.

Even though it was indeed one of the most remarkable markets in America, it wasn't one of the most "remarkable" in the world.

 

The Incas? They had a market in several cities in their empire. Along with the Tambos (Free and clean hotels for travelers!), the markets in the Inca Empire were one of the most active in places of cultural diffusion in America.

Among the most important spots were Pisac (were modernly there is a new market), Tambo Colorado, Pikimachay, and (two of the most important) Cajamarca and Chavin de Huantar--generally regarded as one of the most improved markets in the American continent.

All he did was use your ignorant comments and a poor attempt at English.

 No, it was a perfecty said sentence it's just you couldn't comprehend it because you don't want to.

Nice try, but you have no points Yes, they can. Why do you think the Aztec lost? they were worn out, so were the Spanish. It was an ongoing battle, I find it pathetic that you are trying to say you can't have an ongoing battle.

You have no proof, once more. You try and cover it up with clever comments, nice try.

That's only why it was larger than any market and more active, right? Including Constantinople and Venice. Oh and it was even larger than Seville.

No one cared about the Incan markets because they were not great like the Aztecs' markets.

oh and Ivan, Aztecs created some of the most complex social systems and were masters of astrology. Incans...uh...made...uhm...fortresses...and...uh...machu picchu?

Ivan el Terrible:

CosmicJaguar:

Ivan el Terrible:

CosmicJaguar:

Ivan el Terrible:

I like how u ignored my psot Cosmic Jaguar, but eitehr u got proves aztecs were more technologically advanced, if u did noticed, in my own opinion the aztecs and teh incas are = in technological advances as msot of the American natives, and read my post plz, and Incas did a lto of great things, Aztecs, ummm, expet Tenochtitlan what they did? poop?

Uh what?

lol now u are trying to act like u dont understand me... very nice, very nice. 

I didn't understand what you said, at all.

Oh and the Aztec did everything better than the Inca except for some economic elements of the nation

hahahahah, Are u kidding? Incas had tons of more research than the Aztecs, in weaponry:

was the best organized of its time (15-16th centuries). It consisted of several battalions organized, often in large scale numbers. Warriors wore tunics, often with chessboard patterns which was the army's dress. They used several weapons such as:

• Sling, used as distance weapon to kill enemies on distances. Special slinger units were assign to these hola
• Clubs, used to break enemies arm as a main weapon.
• Bronze knives, the Incas had not access to iron as Europeans nor obsidian as the Aztecs. They fairly used swords, just shorter weapons.
• Scythes, medium lengthed weapons with blades at the tip the curved, forming a scythe.
• The Incas used armors fairly, made of gold which made them not regular equipment nor effective. Mostly sub-officers used them.
• Axes used to slash through enemies armour and to break weapons like spears.

The Incas were very well organized in battle. In opposite to the Aztecs, which waged war mainly to take prisoners of war to execute in religious ceremonies, only taking tributes as gain from the defeated people, the Incas aim with war was to kill enemy soldiers and to directly conquer enemy lands, putting it under the rule of the Sapa Inca, who was the highest head of the army. The Incas were also very well organized in military logistcics, using magazines owned by the state to supply mass contingents with food, and also white tents as camp, organized in symmetric patterns that imposed on the Europeans, who had neither this control nor order in their armies.

Ummmm, opportunity against the Spanish?

the Incas were at more of a disadvantage because
 of their civil war. The Aztecs were in a much better position by the
 time the Spanish got to them.
 
If the Spanish had to gotten to the Incas at the same time they did the
 Aztecs, then the Incas would have easily mowed Cortez and all of his
 cronnies.
 

 Ummm what more?

"The Inca made beautiful objects of gold, silver, copper, bronze and
 tumbago . But precious metals were in shorter supply than in earlier
 Peruvian cultures. The Inca metalworking style draws much of its
 inspiration from Chimú art and in fact the best metal workers of Chan Chan were
 transferred to Cusco when the Kingdom of Chimor was incorporated into
 the empire. Unlike the Chimú, the Inca do not seem to have regarded
 metals to be as precious as fine cloth. Nonetheless, the metalworks of the
 Incas were perhaps the most advanced in America." 

 So dont say that tenochtitlan was the best thing ever done, oh yeah, and dont forget macchu 

Picchu, considered too 1 of the wonders of the world, its lame that the incas didnt finished it 

because of the Spanish war, althgouht that would be a very great thing, much ebtter than 

tenochtitlan thoguht, Oh yeah, General20 asked in much posts before the sources, which 

sources u used, u just trying to say Aztecs are the best and dont knowing that they werent as 

good as Incas, of coruse Aztecs are really a good civ and I really like em, but u need to accept 

that incas are better Cosmic Jaguar, And lets remember that the Incas did fortresses, what did 

the aztecs do? (dont say tenochtitlan). Oh and since u never posted sources that showed those 

lies about the incas, we again proved that u lied, and you can stop being an aztec fanboy, since 

we proves Incas were better, just be a good boy and leave this thread please  If you are 

intelligent, u wont reply to this, exception that u will post sources that proves your tons of lies 

to the incas and the unproved aztec things that u said. 

 

 

 

The Aztecs had a sling, axe, atlatl, sword, halberd/spear, obsidian knives, and armor.

Once again, using wikipedia is terrible idea for a source of information. The Aztecs did KILL their enemies in war, only at certain times would they take prisoners or to move up in ranks.

Stop copying what GeneralMoron is saying, it's not fact.

Tenochtitlan was the most astounding city ever built in the Americas, except maybe Teotihuacan. Machu Picchu is praised because of where it's built, that's basically it. Tenochtitlan was the epitome of a grandeur city.

Incan cities do not even rival. They weren't even worth the time for the Spanish! hahahaha.

CosmicJaguar:

Ivan el Terrible:

CosmicJaguar:

Ivan el Terrible:

CosmicJaguar:

Ivan el Terrible:

I like how u ignored my psot Cosmic Jaguar, but eitehr u got proves aztecs were more technologically advanced, if u did noticed, in my own opinion the aztecs and teh incas are = in technological advances as msot of the American natives, and read my post plz, and Incas did a lto of great things, Aztecs, ummm, expet Tenochtitlan what they did? poop?

Uh what?

lol now u are trying to act like u dont understand me... very nice, very nice. 

I didn't understand what you said, at all.

Oh and the Aztec did everything better than the Inca except for some economic elements of the nation

hahahahah, Are u kidding? Incas had tons of more research than the Aztecs, in weaponry:

was the best organized of its time (15-16th centuries). It consisted of several battalions organized, often in large scale numbers. Warriors wore tunics, often with chessboard patterns which was the army's dress. They used several weapons such as:

• Sling, used as distance weapon to kill enemies on distances. Special slinger units were assign to these hola
• Clubs, used to break enemies arm as a main weapon.
• Bronze knives, the Incas had not access to iron as Europeans nor obsidian as the Aztecs. They fairly used swords, just shorter weapons.
• Scythes, medium lengthed weapons with blades at the tip the curved, forming a scythe.
• The Incas used armors fairly, made of gold which made them not regular equipment nor effective. Mostly sub-officers used them.
• Axes used to slash through enemies armour and to break weapons like spears.

The Incas were very well organized in battle. In opposite to the Aztecs, which waged war mainly to take prisoners of war to execute in religious ceremonies, only taking tributes as gain from the defeated people, the Incas aim with war was to kill enemy soldiers and to directly conquer enemy lands, putting it under the rule of the Sapa Inca, who was the highest head of the army. The Incas were also very well organized in military logistcics, using magazines owned by the state to supply mass contingents with food, and also white tents as camp, organized in symmetric patterns that imposed on the Europeans, who had neither this control nor order in their armies.

Ummmm, opportunity against the Spanish?

the Incas were at more of a disadvantage because
 of their civil war. The Aztecs were in a much better position by the
 time the Spanish got to them.
 
If the Spanish had to gotten to the Incas at the same time they did the
 Aztecs, then the Incas would have easily mowed Cortez and all of his
 cronnies.
 

 Ummm what more?

"The Inca made beautiful objects of gold, silver, copper, bronze and
 tumbago . But precious metals were in shorter supply than in earlier
 Peruvian cultures. The Inca metalworking style draws much of its
 inspiration from Chimú art and in fact the best metal workers of Chan Chan were
 transferred to Cusco when the Kingdom of Chimor was incorporated into
 the empire. Unlike the Chimú, the Inca do not seem to have regarded
 metals to be as precious as fine cloth. Nonetheless, the metalworks of the
 Incas were perhaps the most advanced in America." 

 So dont say that tenochtitlan was the best thing ever done, oh yeah, and dont forget macchu 

Picchu, considered too 1 of the wonders of the world, its lame that the incas didnt finished it 

because of the Spanish war, althgouht that would be a very great thing, much ebtter than 

tenochtitlan thoguht, Oh yeah, General20 asked in much posts before the sources, which 

sources u used, u just trying to say Aztecs are the best and dont knowing that they werent as 

good as Incas, of coruse Aztecs are really a good civ and I really like em, but u need to accept 

that incas are better Cosmic Jaguar, And lets remember that the Incas did fortresses, what did 

the aztecs do? (dont say tenochtitlan). Oh and since u never posted sources that showed those 

lies about the incas, we again proved that u lied, and you can stop being an aztec fanboy, since 

we proves Incas were better, just be a good boy and leave this thread please  If you are 

intelligent, u wont reply to this, exception that u will post sources that proves your tons of lies 

to the incas and the unproved aztec things that u said. 

 

 

 

The Aztecs had a sling, axe, atlatl, sword, halberd/spear, obsidian knives, and armor.

Once again, using wikipedia is terrible idea for a source of information. The Aztecs did KILL their enemies in war, only at certain times would they take prisoners or to move up in ranks.

Stop copying what GeneralMoron is saying, it's not fact.

Tenochtitlan was the most astounding city ever built in the Americas, except maybe Teotihuacan. Machu Picchu is praised because of where it's built, that's basically it. Tenochtitlan was the epitome of a grandeur city.

Incan cities do not even rival. They weren't even worth the time for the Spanish! hahahaha.

actaully I guess, wikipedia had copies of other websites if u didnt known tat and many people helping and editing so dont say nooby things about wikipedia, and if u compare the weapons that I said to those that u said, umm incas win I guess, even theres added how were incas better than Aztecs, actaually what he said were copy from a web site too... And, so is it a fact what are u saying? And I hate your Ignorance, Macchu Picchu was labeled too of the wonders of the world, Macchu Picchu+incas fortresses are much ebttr than your Tenochtitlan, and let me remember u that aztecs did expand their empire and build many cities, can u tell me what did the Aztecs did that wasnt Tenochtitlan, and once more u ignored this:

Ivan el Terrible:

 Oh and since u never posted sources that showed those 

lies about the incas, we again proved that u lied, and you can stop being an aztec fanboy, since 

we proves Incas were better, just be a good boy and leave this thread please  If you are 

intelligent, u wont reply to this, exception that u will post sources that proves your tons of lies 

to the incas and the unproved aztec things that u said. 

 

You did posted too and didnt said sources, not counting my previous post, once again u proved u are a noob in this thread cosmic idiot.

CosmicJaguar:

GeneralN20:

WOOT!!!! IVAN! IVAN! IVAN!

Lol. He whooped you big time there Cosmic. Good job Ivan.

When did I say that they were more technologically advanced and greater than the Moors?

A while back you mocked my usage of language. The sentenced you posted in regards to this statement was completely badly structured. As such, your meaning was distorted--hence what I understood.

Write better sentences so that I may understand you.

You post an emoticon because you have nothing to say.

True, I don't have words other than insults for stupid comments. I was taught to best not say anything than to mention bad things, thus I post the face.

it's been noted that the Siege of Tenochtitlan was the longest ongoing battle in history.

DUDE! Nobody can fight ongoingly for a month; neither can they do it in a day.

Stop posting LIES!!!

There is no proof that the Inca bested them at anything.

Lol. You just have to use common sense, something which you apparently lack.

Rise of Nations got it pretty damn well, giving the Inca extremely weak units and giving the Aztec the upper-hand of the Pre-Columbian nations

Lol. Civilization is much more historically accurate.

Sid Meier is one of the best game designers in the world, he makes the Civilization games, and he focuses on historical factualness and good gameplay. Some Civilizations are weaker than others, but that's just how it really was.

The Incas, in the game, are one of the most powerful civilizations.

Exactly, you have no proof that they were more technolically advanced.

That's only why Tlatelolco was one of the most remarkable cities/markets to ever exist, right?

Lololololololol.

Lesson: Tlatelolco was made by the Aztecs as a separate (small) city. It was soon absorded into Tenochtitlan and made a district within it.

By the time it became "remarkable" it was no longer an independent city, it was a district within Tenochtitlan.

Even though it was indeed one of the most remarkable markets in America, it wasn't one of the most "remarkable" in the world.

 

The Incas? They had a market in several cities in their empire. Along with the Tambos (Free and clean hotels for travelers!), the markets in the Inca Empire were one of the most active in places of cultural diffusion in America.

Among the most important spots were Pisac (were modernly there is a new market), Tambo Colorado, Pikimachay, and (two of the most important) Cajamarca and Chavin de Huantar--generally regarded as one of the most improved markets in the American continent.

All he did was use your ignorant comments and a poor attempt at English.

 No, it was a perfecty said sentence it's just you couldn't comprehend it because you don't want to.

Nice try, but you have no points Yes, they can. Why do you think the Aztec lost? they were worn out, so were the Spanish. It was an ongoing battle, I find it pathetic that you are trying to say you can't have an ongoing battle.

You have no proof, once more. You try and cover it up with clever comments, nice try.

That's only why it was larger than any market and more active, right? Including Constantinople and Venice. Oh and it was even larger than Seville.

No one cared about the Incan markets because they were not great like the Aztecs' markets.

 

oh and Ivan, Aztecs created some of the most complex social systems and were masters of astrology. Incans...uh...made...uhm...fortresses...and...uh...machu picchu?

OK I wont reply compeltely to this post since u refering mostly to General, dude, about social  systems LLOO0OLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Can u show me a website that says that plz , I would like to see sources, it will be lame if u ignore this as all other what u read, trying to be as an aztec fanboy, and we arent inca fanboy as u said noob, we compeltely agree than the aztec was a great empire, but we are saying inca was better, its just that u cant accept it, and lets return to social  systems, dude, Incas had a civil war, they had much social systems than your Aztecs, and about astrology, arent u confusing to the Mayans?

Jack The IV:

HOLY **** DOYOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MUCH MEMORY 30 CIVS WOULD TAKE UP!?

dude idiot, calm down, and can u show me the post that says that I wanted 30 civs, umm letme answer for u "I cant do that ivanelterrible because u never said it, u just said 3 civs more (1 for aoe3, other for TWC, and the other one from TAD, I am a complete moron and I need to calm down, I am verey sorry"  If u will say something thats a bit alike this, dont even post, I dont want to read the stupid things of a 2nd noob in this thread (the first one is cosmicjaguar if u wondering who is it).

Ivan el Terrible:

CosmicJaguar:

Ivan el Terrible:

CosmicJaguar:

Ivan el Terrible:

CosmicJaguar:

Ivan el Terrible:

I like how u ignored my psot Cosmic Jaguar, but eitehr u got proves aztecs were more technologically advanced, if u did noticed, in my own opinion the aztecs and teh incas are = in technological advances as msot of the American natives, and read my post plz, and Incas did a lto of great things, Aztecs, ummm, expet Tenochtitlan what they did? poop?

Uh what?

lol now u are trying to act like u dont understand me... very nice, very nice. 

I didn't understand what you said, at all.

Oh and the Aztec did everything better than the Inca except for some economic elements of the nation

hahahahah, Are u kidding? Incas had tons of more research than the Aztecs, in weaponry:

was the best organized of its time (15-16th centuries). It consisted of several battalions organized, often in large scale numbers. Warriors wore tunics, often with chessboard patterns which was the army's dress. They used several weapons such as:

• Sling, used as distance weapon to kill enemies on distances. Special slinger units were assign to these hola
• Clubs, used to break enemies arm as a main weapon.
• Bronze knives, the Incas had not access to iron as Europeans nor obsidian as the Aztecs. They fairly used swords, just shorter weapons.
• Scythes, medium lengthed weapons with blades at the tip the curved, forming a scythe.
• The Incas used armors fairly, made of gold which made them not regular equipment nor effective. Mostly sub-officers used them.
• Axes used to slash through enemies armour and to break weapons like spears.

The Incas were very well organized in battle. In opposite to the Aztecs, which waged war mainly to take prisoners of war to execute in religious ceremonies, only taking tributes as gain from the defeated people, the Incas aim with war was to kill enemy soldiers and to directly conquer enemy lands, putting it under the rule of the Sapa Inca, who was the highest head of the army. The Incas were also very well organized in military logistcics, using magazines owned by the state to supply mass contingents with food, and also white tents as camp, organized in symmetric patterns that imposed on the Europeans, who had neither this control nor order in their armies.

Ummmm, opportunity against the Spanish?

the Incas were at more of a disadvantage because
 of their civil war. The Aztecs were in a much better position by the
 time the Spanish got to them.
 
If the Spanish had to gotten to the Incas at the same time they did the
 Aztecs, then the Incas would have easily mowed Cortez and all of his
 cronnies.
 

 Ummm what more?

"The Inca made beautiful objects of gold, silver, copper, bronze and
 tumbago . But precious metals were in shorter supply than in earlier
 Peruvian cultures. The Inca metalworking style draws much of its
 inspiration from Chimú art and in fact the best metal workers of Chan Chan were
 transferred to Cusco when the Kingdom of Chimor was incorporated into
 the empire. Unlike the Chimú, the Inca do not seem to have regarded
 metals to be as precious as fine cloth. Nonetheless, the metalworks of the
 Incas were perhaps the most advanced in America." 

 So dont say that tenochtitlan was the best thing ever done, oh yeah, and dont forget macchu 

Picchu, considered too 1 of the wonders of the world, its lame that the incas didnt finished it 

because of the Spanish war, althgouht that would be a very great thing, much ebtter than 

tenochtitlan thoguht, Oh yeah, General20 asked in much posts before the sources, which 

sources u used, u just trying to say Aztecs are the best and dont knowing that they werent as 

good as Incas, of coruse Aztecs are really a good civ and I really like em, but u need to accept 

that incas are better Cosmic Jaguar, And lets remember that the Incas did fortresses, what did 

the aztecs do? (dont say tenochtitlan). Oh and since u never posted sources that showed those 

lies about the incas, we again proved that u lied, and you can stop being an aztec fanboy, since 

we proves Incas were better, just be a good boy and leave this thread please  If you are 

intelligent, u wont reply to this, exception that u will post sources that proves your tons of lies 

to the incas and the unproved aztec things that u said. 

 

 

 

The Aztecs had a sling, axe, atlatl, sword, halberd/spear, obsidian knives, and armor.

Once again, using wikipedia is terrible idea for a source of information. The Aztecs did KILL their enemies in war, only at certain times would they take prisoners or to move up in ranks.

Stop copying what GeneralMoron is saying, it's not fact.

Tenochtitlan was the most astounding city ever built in the Americas, except maybe Teotihuacan. Machu Picchu is praised because of where it's built, that's basically it. Tenochtitlan was the epitome of a grandeur city.

Incan cities do not even rival. They weren't even worth the time for the Spanish! hahahaha.

actaully I guess, wikipedia had copies of other websites if u didnt known tat and many people helping and editing so dont say nooby things about wikipedia, and if u compare the weapons that I said to those that u said, umm incas win I guess, even theres added how were incas better than Aztecs, actaually what he said were copy from a web site too... And, so is it a fact what are u saying? And I hate your Ignorance, Macchu Picchu was labeled too of the wonders of the world, Macchu Picchu+incas fortresses are much ebttr than your Tenochtitlan, and let me remember u that aztecs did expand their empire and build many cities, can u tell me what did the Aztecs did that wasnt Tenochtitlan, and once more u ignored this:

 

Oh and since u never posted sources that showed those

lies about the incas, we again proved that u lied, and you can stop being an aztec fanboy, since 

we proves Incas were better, just be a good boy and leave this thread please  If you are 

intelligent, u wont reply to this, exception that u will post sources that proves your tons of lies 

to the incas and the unproved aztec things that u said. 

You did posted too and didnt said sources, not counting my previous post, once again u proved u are a noob in this thread cosmic idiot.

 

Cholula, Tlatelolco, Complex Campaigns, Calender system, Written language, Complex social system, Modern day legal system, Grand Pyramids, Unique Aqueduct system, etc.

Inca fortresses? are you kidding? they are primitive buildings. They don't even rival an aztec house.

I've told you SEVERAL times to read Aztec Warrior by John Pohl.

"The arms employed by the Aztecs were quite capable of wreaking such havoc upon their opponents. Sullivan's statements to the contrary do not withstand an examination of the primary sources. Díaz del Castillo states that the macuahuitl cut better than the Spanish swords. During one battle, Aguilar notes that:

"One Indian at a single stroke cut open the whole neck of Cristóbal de Olid's horse, killing the horse. The Indian of the other side slashed at the second horseman an