AOE3 Forums

i really like the idea. But i dont really wish there will be atomic bombs made.

i made up a unit: Lbow man: A old fashioned archer unit.

hahahaha joking. (it appeared in both age 2 and 3...i dunno with 1)

Seamonster:

This may sound noobish but, WHAT IS RON-COH? Just wondering

But yea i hope ES could pull of something like this
 

RON Rise Of Nations

COH Company of Heroes

I think it would be a mix of both.

its a relly good idea but, ww1-ww2 games should all be shooting games not stratigies, so instead of  cammanding an army u are one guy:D

i relly hope aoe4 is a remamke of aoe2or aoe1 the gameplay in those 2 games are verygood, and wit some graphics its a winner:D

yoyoland:

its a relly good idea but, ww1-ww2 games should all be shooting games not stratigies, so instead of  cammanding an army u are one guy:D

lol. it will turn from a RTS game into something like CS or SF.

Spangopola:

i really like the idea. But i dont really wish there will be atomic bombs made.

i made up a unit: Lbow man: A old fashioned archer unit.

hahahaha joking. (it appeared in both age 2 and 3...i dunno with 1)

probably right about the atom bomb, but it was just a not really used weapon in WW2 (only used in the end).

Im just gonna say if they have a atom bomb in AoE4, it would probably be the most expensive unit than upgrading to Age 5.... and it would have to be built in age 5. 

guy_123:

I dont think it would really be a fun game. It would leave the everything else behind. And as for countries what about Canada? Keep in mind that Canada supplied more than 600,000 soldiers to the war effort, while industrial and agricultural production, for war purposes, were also drastically increased. In the end, more than 60,000 Canadians lost their life in the war. All this was achieved by a country of no more than 7,000,000 people

W00T! (waives Canadian flag patriotically.)

Seamonster:

Oh i forgot some stuff to. sry.

Maps: The maps would take place in Europe, Russia, the Pacific, and North Africa (Some civilizations fought in north africa because Italy and maybe others took that place over)

Suggested maps: PACIFIC-

Iwo Jima

Battle of Midway

Phillipines

 Pearl Harbor

Hiroshima Japan

                          EUROPE-

London (?)

French Countryside

Paris

Normandy Beach (DDAY!!!)

Poland 

More Places to come... including areas near Russia

                         North Africa

Cairo, Egypt

 Mediterranean

El Alamein

TB Continued...

 

NEW GAME MODE:

First, bring in some of the classic game modes from past games like Regicide, Deathmatch, Supremacy, King of the Hill, and the Treaty games. Second have a new way to make AoE more fun. A WORLD WAR Skirmish.

Unlike normal skirmishes a WWS ( Up there ^   ) is a turn based game that takes place on all maps in AoE4. For Example, you choose you civilization, enemies, allys and yatta yatta, then choose the map or place you want to start at.

 Next you then create 'Armies', which are a group of made units made in a army, then take territories. You can build buildings inside territories to build up you military, and economy (Docks are only built in places with water).

You can assault enemy territories (or the maps in NORMAL skirmish games) to take their territory and build up your Empire.

Attacking in WWS: There will be 2 ways to attack. One, is you take your army, attack them, then play in a normal skirmish game on that map till the player wins. Or the other way is this: The computer decides (FAIRLY) by looking at how large the armies and what buildings are there on the map. If there is a player with a LOT larger army, with navy, or Airplanes, this may give them an advantage in winning this way.

How you win in WWS?? eliminate the enemy! or... you can set how you win by 'the Empire with the most territories by this amount of turns' or... Free for all TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!

 What do you think now?
 

Here's a Russian Map: Stalingrad. Huge battle between Germans and Russians. The Russian citizens fought with guns, clubs, even bricks, because Stalin ordered them to hold Stalingrad at all costs.

Wait, wasn't Finland a part of the USSR in WW2? It was Sweden that stayed free.

And France didn't almost get whooped. They got whooped. This is how it happened...

Poland falls, Britain and France declare war on Germany, and one month later, the French lost. (No offense meant to any French ppl here)

Don't forget China for a nation. The War with Japan and the Chinese Civil War between the communists and nationalists.

Another map: Berlin in the final battle and the Battle of the Bulge. Also, never forget the Marines! You think of the Delta Force but not the Marines? Also, I like the idea of planes, but if they used a ton, it'd be a serious lag on any comp. Maybe a limit of 10-20.

Main character suggestion: Russian soldier who fights for the USSR with his life. Chinese Nationalist soldier who tries to fight the Communists, and goes with the survivors to Taiwan. American Marine who fights in D-Day, Battle of the Bulge, and other conflicts. American Army Ranger, trying to free POWs in Japan and the Philippines, and also fights in the Philippines (another map suggestion there). German officer captured in D-Day, willingly joins the Allies, and is sent as a spy to assassinate important generals, convince people to defect, and sabotage war efforts. British soldier fighting the Italians and Germans in North Africa. (What were those desert British troops called? Desert Rats?)

And for resources, putting workers on the frontline would have them dead fast. Maybe having a Resource Base in friendly territory that constantly delivered resources would work better. Maybe having a few workers sent in to scavenge the enemy lines for equipment and build would be ok. But the soldiers in WW1 would be the ones making trenches and everything, and special Weapon Specialists would set up machine guns, fix artillery, etc. And some kind of unit could place land mines and barbed wire in the no-man's land.

Final map suggestions...

Guadelcanal

POW freedom like in that movie the Great Raid, where you need to destroy the Japanese base and free the prisoners.

Liberating France

Poland (with the German-Russian joint attack)

and they may need some what if maps

double post sorry

kentimetre:

Making WWI and WWII games ES would have to remake multi cause I dont think it would be realistic for French vs Britain game to happen on Multi cause they were on the same side during both battles

And the Portuguese and the British were on the same side in the Napoleonic Wars. We still see Ports vs, Brits don't we? Such a game wouldn't be that out of the blue since there were some traitor French units I recall which did fight for Nazi Germany in WW2. The point however is that as long as the game stays balanced it doesn't really matter who fights who.

strategyking:

 

Here's a Russian Map: Stalingrad. Huge battle between Germans and Russians. The Russian citizens fought with guns, clubs, even bricks, because Stalin ordered them to hold Stalingrad at all costs.

Wait, wasn't Finland a part of the USSR in WW2? It was Sweden that stayed free.

I think finland wasnt in that battle, not sure.