|
|
Last post 11-13-2008, 5:27 PM by Chriz. 12 replies.
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: There is not a best civ
hmmmmmmmmmm...........
I agree.
Working for Knights and Barbarian mod... Be sure to check it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: There is not a best civ
parthenon:
what u just said is very very VERY true in supremecy,
however the civs r a little more lopsided in deathmatch
o and about that "any civ can beat any civ"
that is true, but certain civs counter certain civs
(this is talking about supremecy) like for example:
u would not rush a dutch opponent with jans if ur ottoman would u?
of course not! dutch get skirms in the colonial age
but u could rush them with germans because they get cav with every HC shipment
so it just goes to show-that each civ counters another and choosing the right civ to fight can up ur chances to win dramatically
a person that can play all the civs well will have a better win % than a person that can play one civ really well
there is nothing to fear but fear itself
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: There is not a best civ
parthenon: I get sick of this question "im a noob whats the best civ to use?" if there was one best civ there wouldnt be a choice of civs to pick from. Any civ can beat any civ and any civ can lose to any civ. Just try em all find one you like and practice. Yes you will be beat in this game and yes you will get frustrated, but those who get frustrated and figure out what "not to do" next time will win games. There are no easy ways to win in this game unless you just noob bash which i admit is fun. A lot of people including myself devote a large amount of their free time playing this wonderful game, so dont be afraid to lose and dont be suprised when you win.
I agree...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: There is not a best civ
Some Civ have they goodies : For noob I advice the British or the spanish, its easyer because they have simple units but no handicap. L33ts say they "w00t" with the Russkies (lot of units since the start, maybe good for rush ?), For me its the second civ behind the Turkish (With Free farmer its much good)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
-
-
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: There is not a best civ
i think that the dutch civilisation is only good for no rush games, it is too hard to build an economy and militry at the same time. the best economy civs are british and dutch, but their military arent so good, although with rockets british can be formidible.
and ur points on dutch banks, in age two i can get 2-4 banks and have low resources, but as i dont use villagers for gold nemore, i have a few extra hands for food and wood. but if used properly you should have best eco with dutch or british, and i am a noob and i get good economy with these
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
|
|