AOE3 Forums

Inca - Economic civilization with mediocre units but the ability to greatly increase resource gathering.

Cherokee - Mostly cavalry civilization, mounted gunpower units.

GeneralN20:

Many people would like more civilizations, and I know that this topic has been repeated tons, and tons of times, but what u think about adding 2 civs to aoe3 (or none if u are lazy), 1 civ to TWC, and 1 to TAD,

Well, back on topic. These are the civilizations that would probably do the nicest addition to the game:

 -Inca.

-Italy.

-Sweden.

-Cherokee (maybe).

Korea was not really so much as a power by this time. Aside from the already-in-game civilizations for East Asia, there is no better one to add. I also would suppose the Cherokee would be a good addition.

Actaully adding 2 civs to the war chiefs would be a lot, first lets wait for 1, then the other :). And I am thinking about Korea because it was mcuh powerful than India in its time (I am not sure). And oh yeah, Austria isnt a bad civ either thought,

@ Cosmic: All I have to say to you is that the Cherokee didn't run around in horses. Obviously, once more, you don't know what the crap you're talking about. I'm just leaving it at that because I don't care about discussing anything else with a childish person like you.

Actaully adding 2 civs to the war chiefs would be a lot, first lets wait for 1, then the other :).

I highly doubt they are going to make another X-pack, so the only option they can add these into the game would by patches. Yet that would take up a lot of time to download. Nevertheless, it would be a neat option.

And I am thinking about Korea because it was mcuh powerful than India in its time (I am not sure).

The Mughal Empire in India was quite powerful, I think even more-so than Korea and Japan. The Mughals were involved in situations with the Ottomans and the Russians, more-so than China.

Adding Korea would not really make much sense, specially since later they get conquered by Japan. Added that they'd compete with the Aztecs for the spot of "midget empire." j/k 

And oh yeah, Austria isnt a bad civ either thought,

I agree with you, Austria was a very strong civilization at those times. Yet, its affairs mainly involved those of Europe and Africa--not America or East Asia.

Italy and Sweden, on the other hand, although also had strong affairs in Europe; they had several colonists from their lands come to America.

Sweden also even had a colony, I think, that lasted for some time and was close to that of the English colonies. I think either the Swedish abandoned the colony, or the English took it over.

Italy was also a very active nation, which was unified before Germany. Italian culture is quite vivid in several countries in America nowadays too.

GeneralN20:

@ Cosmic: All I have to say to you is that the Cherokee didn't run around in horses. Obviously, once more, you don't know what the crap you're talking about. I'm just leaving it at that because I don't care about discussing anything else with a childish person like you.

 

Actaully adding 2 civs to the war chiefs would be a lot, first lets wait for 1, then the other :).

I highly doubt they are going to make another X-pack, so the only option they can add these into the game would by patches. Yet that would take up a lot of time to download. Nevertheless, it would be a neat option.

And I am thinking about Korea because it was mcuh powerful than India in its time (I am not sure).

The Mughal Empire in India was quite powerful, I think even more-so than Korea and Japan. The Mughals were involved in situations with the Ottomans and the Russians, more-so than China.

Adding Korea would not really make much sense, specially since later they get conquered by Japan. Added that they'd compete with the Aztecs for the spot of "midget empire." j/k 

And oh yeah, Austria isnt a bad civ either thought,

I agree with you, Austria was a very strong civilization at those times. Yet, its affairs mainly involved those of Europe and Africa--not America or East Asia.

Italy and Sweden, on the other hand, although also had strong affairs in Europe; they had several colonists from their lands come to America.

Sweden also even had a colony, I think, that lasted for some time and was close to that of the English colonies. I think either the Swedish abandoned the colony, or the English took it over.

Italy was also a very active nation, which was unified before Germany. Italian culture is quite vivid in several countries in America nowadays too.

 

to start, I ill repeat  this: Ignore cosmic jaguar, he talks without sense and he dont know of what he talking about, exampl, he said that I dont know weven that aztecs had jaguar warriors, and he never showed me when I said it because I NEVER Said that, and OK, we got the civs, for aoe3 Austria, TWC, Incas, and for TAD Mughals.

Must've gotten the Cherokee mixed up with another North American tribe, my bad. I don't have much knowledge on the northern indian tribes/nations. I never said they were always on horse back either. Your arrogance and idiocy is really amusing to be honest.

Ivan, look back in your own thread you moron.

CosmicJaguar:

Must've gotten the Cherokee mixed up with another North American tribe, my bad. I don't have much knowledge on the northern indian tribes/nations. I never said they were always on horse back either. Your arrogance and idiocy is really amusing to be honest.

 

Ivan, look back in your own thread you moron.

Last time I pay u attention.

Theres no page liket hat, I enver made soemthing like that, only post I did its about that aztecs didnt had coyotes and either puma lancers, I am not sure about puma lancers but yes about coyotes. But actually I may be wrong.

About the Mughals, they already are in the game as: India.

Instead of adding a new East Asian civilization, they should add another Native American or European civilization.

I would agree with this list:

-Inca.

-Italy.

-Austria.

They just named the lancers "puma lancers" so they could have a unique name.

Lol. They had to come up with funky names for dressed-up units.

I can seriously picture ES making a unit for the inca called: "Condor Warrior."

OK lol since Cosmic jaguar left agecomm (I think he did, I mean, I didnt seen him posting in 6 months, we can continue this discussion without that noob insulting us.

Even though I think that almost everyone that ever posted here have left agecomm too...