...if they were included in the game? You can choose any civilization from any time period and name why you think it would be considered the worst in the game.
Try not to be racist.
This thread might get locked from flaming and such.I dont think theres no wosrt civ, every civs got its own play style, strengths and weakneses. You just got to know how to play them well.
the worst civ would be in my dreams where by people used cards as weapons :P
actually, all civs started out as tiny groups of hopeless (in comparison to today) people trying to follow the sun
Chinese because they are.
on a side note, if i were not being racist like you said, ports.
Chinese or India
Chinese have really cheap and some what weak units and is a pain to pay for a unit you don't want.
India you pay wood for villagers i mean wtf in every game that i play in the begin i always run out of wood to fast when i palyed India i just don't like paying wood and also there units are weak (there infantry hand units).
Well my oppion might change in the next millenium
haroldlkh: the worst civ would be in my dreams where by people used cards as weapons :P
Yu Gi Oh!!!! lol
GuitarHeroMatt: haroldlkh: the worst civ would be in my dreams where by people used cards as weapons :P Yu Gi Oh!!!! lol
Daemien: GuitarHeroMatt: haroldlkh: the worst civ would be in my dreams where by people used cards as weapons :P Yu Gi Oh!!!! lol yu gey ho! i hate that game
Lol me too. I used to play it in primary school, until I realised how utterly stupid it was...
in treaty 1vs1 sioux is undoubtfully the worst civ because of the lack of walls, of course. but apart from that i would say iroquois, portuguese, dutch and ottos.
me too, I pretty liked it when I was 10 years old.
But then I realized that wasting 15 dollars on a *** drawing in a card its a pretty stupid waste of money. I would prefer getting other 15 dollars and buying a video game than wasting 173 dollars to play a mediocre cards game.