AOE3 Forums

i haven't playing in a long while and want to start up again im sorry if somebody has this post already but i ant to learn to use brits well please post nr40 eco build order or strat....a independent one please don't tell me to ally with French and FT cause that doesn't always happen i need to know how to livestock boom effectively please be more detailed than mass cows then gather...ty in advance

Treaty is fine for the basics, and you can play a few of them, yet you should really try some supremacy games. This shows your true skills. Any expert at rush can dominate in treaty after 5 games yet it will take over 100 games to truely get used to sup games.

EdyPegasus:

Treaty is fine for the basics, and you can play a few of them, yet you should really try some supremacy games. This shows your true skills. Any expert at rush can dominate in treaty after 5 games yet it will take over 100 games to truely get used to sup games.

 

OMG what is wrong with all those sup players always thining treaty is easy i would probrley bash you lol

for exempel lamming gendarme with french you sup players dont understand but infact thats the best way to play french ( i dont play french )

players of same level 

sup = 50 % chance to win

treaty = 50 % chance to win

 

so explain me why is treaty easy lol

 

 

 

They do have something wrong. Not long ago I played with a guy who is 1st lt treaty but major in sup. He got his treaty rank from playing nr 10. So we were in same team and as we played along I found out that he knows nothing about long treaty games. He used french and only made 1 wall and around 15 stables behind. Then he constantly asked me what unit should I ''spam''. Then all he did was spamming gendarmes against a bunch of doppels for the whole game. After he ran out of eco and I started calling him a noob, then he said to me '1v1 sup see who wins'. I dont think most of the sup players know how to play long treaty games at all. They think treaty games are just like team sup games which you only make 1-2 units for the whole game.

it might take a few sup players a little bit of time to learn a few things about treaty, or realize that they have to take the decks seriously, and do a few boring things, but if they are good enought at sup they can probably make the top of treaty, but obviously major isnt it.

lol, you wont have any trouble being top 5 in treaty (if ur the same trojan im thinking of). ask dom he plays treaty abit on tad

The solution is to play sup and treaty at the same time!

 

Treaty you only have to deal with one element of gameplay, late game where everyone is at age 5 and has maxed out their villagers. Therefore it's basically spam wars until someone's eco dies. Obviously there are strategies of going to the flank of your opponents bases with daimyos or oprichniks and trying to get in to kill his villagers.

But the fact that you can make an endless amount of walls for very little wood kind of ruins the fun of the game.

Supremacy players have to deal with different strategies through each Age, also the problem of when to age up. Is it better to have slightly better units, get to fortress or industrial age, or Build more units with the resources you spent aging up?

also historically NR games are always looked down on in RTS circles. It means you don't have the skill to counter a rush and survive early game.
 

wow all these post help fine then post a brit sup or treaty strat

dunebug12k:

Treaty you only have to deal with one element of gameplay, late game where everyone is at age 5 and has maxed out their villagers. Therefore it's basically spam wars until someone's eco dies. Obviously there are strategies of going to the flank of your opponents bases with daimyos or oprichniks and trying to get in to kill his villagers.

But the fact that you can make an endless amount of walls for very little wood kind of ruins the fun of the game.

Supremacy players have to deal with different strategies through each Age, also the problem of when to age up. Is it better to have slightly better units, get to fortress or industrial age, or Build more units with the resources you spent aging up?

also historically NR games are always looked down on in RTS circles. It means you don't have the skill to counter a rush and survive early game.
 

Endless amount of walls, I have seen most players only make around 5-6 walls, only few players (including me) make 10 walls. The truth is 5-6 walls are easy to break down with 5 mortors, it probably takes like 1-2 mins to break a hole. Btw survive a good rush isn't hard at all, I play treaty and I know what to do in sup games.

It seems like everyone says that in treaty you just spam units untill you run out of eco. I play Spain, and my eco rarely runs out. Actually, I can't remember the last game I played where someone ran out of eco before their eco was broken into. I usually play 3v3 on Andes with players major+, and usually the game is decided before anybody's eco runs out.