 eliotyuhin99:They do have something wrong. Not long ago I played with a guy who is 1st lt treaty but major in sup. He got his treaty rank from playing nr 10. So we were in same team and as we played along I found out that he knows nothing about long treaty games. He used french and only made 1 wall and around 15 stables behind. Then he constantly asked me what unit should I ''spam''. Then all he did was spamming gendarmes against a bunch of doppels for the whole game. After he ran out of eco and I started calling him a noob, then he said to me '1v1 sup see who wins'. I dont think most of the sup players know how to play long treaty games at all. They think treaty games are just like team sup games which you only make 1-2 units for the whole game.
i cant believe that a major in supremcy will lame crussairs on doppels........lol
and personally both games can help u a lot.
rush games experience helps me a lot when i play treaty....i have a much better eco management in treaty after i started playing rush.
and treaty experience helps me in late game rush games.
but if you ask me i would say rush is more challenging then treaty.
rush requires more multi tasking then treaty.
in a rush game you dont get many second chances but in treaty you get many.
in a rush game you dont have much time to think and react accordingly but in treaty you got a lot of time to make your moves.
and about that major guy...some people struggle with simple things but thrive in complexity
|