|
|
Last post 06-22-2012, 12:52 PM by ANKUR. 32 replies.
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
India Good Faith Agreements Boom.
Ankur requested:
http://www.mediafire.com/?oz6iot3abcrkwb9 India boom using Good Faith Agreements as first card. Please note the game was a competitive game so I did gather 2-3 OPish treasures. And the game was played on Orinoco so fur trade wasn't sent until late and may not be an accurate example. Sending this as a first card is a good alternative to wood trickle if you don't like it, or don't have enough room in your deck. It is also superior to using a 20% wood card. Even though this boom was done on Orinoco NR 55, I use it on every map. The general booming in this rec might be poor in some departments because it was played at about 3 am. Also the battle might be worth a watch, it lasted over 2 hours. India vs Germans. EDIT: Also the battle will show me using siege eles in a culv war and constant use of consulate armies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: India Good Faith Agreements Boom.
plz sir, i noob. what does that card do exactly?
AOE3: StormComing - pr37 SoulSong - pr40
LoL: iTzStormNA - Gold I Emma C Watson - Gold III
XBL: adinos blade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: India Good Faith Agreements Boom.
|
ty lordstefan , btw playing india on ori is not that easy , the fight in this rec would be very intresting
knight_br:Optimal explanation .. very succinctly
LordStefanIII: Unkown_Genius:Leave it to Age.Comm to get a thread twenty miles off topic.
:) Or turn into a flame war.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: India Good Faith Agreements Boom.
Why he didnt use more uhlans is beyond rational. If you spam war wagons like that at least try to hide the artillery in them. Making culv is absolutly useless vs india too. Pure skirm, uhlan, falconets should beat india all day long. He kept using too much pop in horse art and war wagons. He could have easily drained india if patience was used. In his defense though, of all the civs, india has best shot beating germany because artillery trains so slow. Maybe he was out classed? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: India Good Faith Agreements Boom.
Well I agree with the fact that he should have made more Uhlans. However I disagree with making Falcs over horse artillery. It's easy to say he could have played different, of course if he did, I would have changed up my game play too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: India Good Faith Agreements Boom.
hmmmmm I don't like it. I hardly use the consulate at all with india except in boom and for the passive. So personally I wouldn't use it. I'd prefer to send 20%. but then again, how much does it affect boom? (cbf watching). Seems like a lot.
samirtobias: A great feeling, for me, requires almost half a roll of toilet paper to clean up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: India Good Faith Agreements Boom.
you can get your 4 vils in age 2 without the card if you put the export-rate on +60% (?) for some minutes. btw if you play with the card you should send it as 2nd card, not as first one... but if you dont want to run with india all the time you should play with cannons from the consulate anyway because the consulate armees spawn i think 50% faster. and you definitely SHOULD play with cannons because its free armee and your oponnent doesnt expect it! http://www.agecommunity.com/stats/GameStats.aspx?loc=en-US&GameID=de7b8ea2-763c-407e-9ad6-2e6172999052&sFlag=2&md=ZS_Treaty in this game i made 23 cannons, 300 chakrams, 700+tigers which allows you beating ports. op 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: India Good Faith Agreements Boom.
yes but why did you switch the position? ;) and i just wanted to say that india can be very taff with cannons etc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Page 1 of 3 (33 items)
1
|
|
|