|
|
Last post 04-26-2008, 3:05 AM by diggo11. 9 replies.
-
-
-
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: Just bought TWC
Fellow:
In what way was this post helping me out?
All you did was tell me what is better and now I am not really interested in TAD when I have the money I might by it but for now I am happy with TWC.
LOL I read a post you put in another thread... ANyway if you are so obsessed with AOE then why don't you have TAD?
WilsontehGreat: Chaob you are a good mate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: Just bought TWC
siux(cant spell) can rush jsut as fast as russia if not faster becase the ydont need to build haouses tehy auto get 200POP.
iroquios have good mantlets for siege and or light cannons plus tomahawk anti cav is OK
aztec in my opinion is like the ports in the sense that they arent good but arent proven to be bad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
diggo11  |
|
|
|
Member |
|
Australia - (insert annyoing slogan here) |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject:
Re: Just bought TWC
Firstly I would get a refund and buy TAD Anyway both Iroquois and Sioux are good. From memory Sioux start with Pop 200 but can't construct walls. The Iroquois have a better military and {(I might be getting confused with the Aztecs about the following) can construct walls}. They also have longhouses (Pop 15). To be honest this quote summed up the Aztecs B-RadG.:The Aztecs in my opinion is like the Portuguese, in the sense that they aren't good but they aren't proven to be bad.
Although TWC is good the three civilizations can't stand up to European civilizations. I like TWC because of its improvements to the existing civilizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|