AOE3 Forums


  advanced
in


Last post 05-30-2008, 3:25 PM by dictator of world. 61 replies.
Page 1 of 5 (62 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Sort Posts:
  •  05-15-2008, 4:20 PM 693665
    yohomes yohomes is not online. Last active: 09-28-2008, 3:15 PM
    Member
    Straight-Up-G
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 287
    Last Post: 09-28-2008
    Member Since: 04-30-2008
    Subject: Macehaultins r bad

    at imperial they have 16 attack and 160 HP with 1.5 speed attack!!!

    that less than most units at lvl 1 upgrade(non upgraded(aka:Hussar(not Imperial Hussar)))

    macehaultin need be better and maybe make them cost more but be better cause attack need skirmisher


    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫҉ ‭

    Q u o t e:
    school

    Q u o t e:
    fail


    two words that were destined to be together.
    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫ ‭‫
  •  05-15-2008, 4:41 PM 693670 in reply to 693665
    LoboSoldier LoboSoldier is not online. Last active: 07-14-2008, 6:11 PM
    Member
    Argentina
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 151
    Last Post: 07-14-2008
    Member Since: 05-10-2008
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad
    i agree with you 50%. Macehualtin aren`t good in the long game, when all the units in the game begin to up levels. but they are good and cheap units that you can use in big numbers in the earlier ages so you can have a better ranged firepower and barrage the enemy with rocks! xD
  •  05-15-2008, 4:48 PM 693678 in reply to 693670
    grøtmedeplejuice grøtmedeplejuice is not online. Last active: 07-02-2008, 4:59 PM
    Member
    Norway
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 76
    Last Post: 07-02-2008
    Member Since: 03-20-2008
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad
    ye, the firerate makes them worthy, but only in colonial.

  •  05-15-2008, 6:27 PM 693697 in reply to 693670
    murdilator murdilator is not online. Last active: 12/03/2008, 5:58 PM
    Member
    Ohio, USA
    Top 200 Contributor
    Total Posts: 654
    Last Post: 12-03-2008
    Member Since: 03-05-2006
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad

    Elite Macehualtins pwn Imperial halbardiers, especially since they are a skirms with a 1.5 ROF (that was in warchiefs).

    Now since they boosted Maces, I think that everybody should use the 20 Mace card, which is just great, considering that it is free! 




    That's right! I wrote it by hand Idea.

    My current Scenarios: 1v1OntarioV2 (http://aoe3.heavengames.com/downloads/showfile.php?fileid=2213)
  •  05-15-2008, 6:42 PM 693702 in reply to 693665
    RasRas RasRas is not online. Last active: 11-29-2008, 4:18 PM
    Member
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 618
    Last Post: 11-29-2008
    Member Since: 07-24-2007
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad
    yohomes:

    at imperial they have 16 attack and 160 HP with 1.5 speed attack!!!

    that less than most units at lvl 1 upgrade(non upgraded(aka:Hussar(not Imperial Hussar)))

    macehaultin need be better and maybe make them cost more but be better cause attack need skirmisher

    late game you are better off using jaugau prowl knight any ways for his 3x multiplier.

    also note that you are comparing him to a hussar. that is entirely irrelevant, they are totaly diffrent units and macuhaultin is barely more than 1/3 the price! 



  •  05-15-2008, 6:59 PM 693712 in reply to 693702
    Иван Грозный Иван Грозный is not online. Last active: 20-10-2008, 3:18 PM
    Member
    My name means Ivan the terrible in russian
    Top 10 Contributor
    Total Posts: 6,458
    Last Post: 10-20-2008
    Member Since: 04-27-2006
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad
    RasRas:
    yohomes:

    at imperial they have 16 attack and 160 HP with 1.5 speed attack!!!

    that less than most units at lvl 1 upgrade(non upgraded(aka:Hussar(not Imperial Hussar)))

    macehaultin need be better and maybe make them cost more but be better cause attack need skirmisher

    late game you are better off using jaugau prowl knight any ways for his 3x multiplier.

    also note that you are comparing him to a hussar. that is entirely irrelevant, they are totaly diffrent units and macuhaultin is barely more than 1/3 the price! 

    completely agree with you rasras. 


  •  05-15-2008, 9:24 PM 693732 in reply to 693702
    yohomes yohomes is not online. Last active: 09-28-2008, 3:15 PM
    Member
    Straight-Up-G
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 287
    Last Post: 09-28-2008
    Member Since: 04-30-2008
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad
    RasRas:
    yohomes:

    at imperial they have 16 attack and 160 HP with 1.5 speed attack!!!

    that less than most units at lvl 1 upgrade(non upgraded(aka:Hussar(not Imperial Hussar)))

    macehaultin need be better and maybe make them cost more but be better cause attack need skirmisher

    late game you are better off using jaugau prowl knight any ways for his 3x multiplier.

    also note that you are comparing him to a hussar. that is entirely irrelevant, they are totaly diffrent units and macuhaultin is barely more than 1/3 the price! 

     

    i didnt compare stuff 2 a hussar, i was saying that imperial macehaultins are worse than most units when they have no upgrades(HUSSAR(no:life gaurd, kings life gaurd, imperial, disciplined,exalted,honored,gaurd,veteran) and they r much worse than a skirmisher that has no upgrades also(well the same i think, if skirms have 1.5 ROF


    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫҉ ‭

    Q u o t e:
    school

    Q u o t e:
    fail


    two words that were destined to be together.
    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫ ‭‫
  •  05-15-2008, 9:30 PM 693733 in reply to 693732
    Иван Грозный Иван Грозный is not online. Last active: 20-10-2008, 3:18 PM
    Member
    My name means Ivan the terrible in russian
    Top 10 Contributor
    Total Posts: 6,458
    Last Post: 10-20-2008
    Member Since: 04-27-2006
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad

    no offense, but you sound like a total noob.

    1. Still, a mace just got almost 1/3 cost of a hussar, exalted or not.
    2. haha, if skirms have 1.5 ROF? but guess what, they dont have it, so dont compare units that have nothing to do with with you are comparing, and either modify the units you compare with...

    Now compare a strelet to a mace...

    o wait, better I will do it...

    Strelet:

    90 HP, 4.5 speed, 30 RR, 60 cost, 10 attack, 3.0 ROF, and 14 range.

    Macehualtin:

    80 HP, 4.5 speed, 30 RR, 70 cost, 8 attack, 1.5 ROF, and 16 range...

    The mace got slightly more cost, less HP and less attack, but it also fires twice fast than a strelet, so its like if it had 15 of attack... But since the strelet costs 50 food and 10 wood, and the mace costs 40 food and 30 wood, and you get wood slower, its all fair and balanced.
     


    Conclusion, both units are fine and dont need any change.


  •  05-15-2008, 9:52 PM 693738 in reply to 693733
    BHcataclysm BHcataclysm is not online. Last active: 10/02/2008, 10:36 AM
    Member
    Connecticut, USA
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 345
    Last Post: 10-02-2008
    Member Since: 02-03-2007
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad

    Double mace's attack and its 32 x2 in imp, but still Jags are a better choice.

    Ivan wouldn't it be better to compare a mace to an archer or better yet a normal skirm? Stretlets are extremely unique and shouldn't be a baseline to compare other units off of.

    Also why in the world would you compare a RI to a cavalry unit. Compare it to other RI.
     


  •  05-15-2008, 10:44 PM 693753 in reply to 693733
    yohomes yohomes is not online. Last active: 09-28-2008, 3:15 PM
    Member
    Straight-Up-G
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 287
    Last Post: 09-28-2008
    Member Since: 04-30-2008
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad
    Иван Грозный:

    no offense, but you sound like a total noob.

    1. Still, a mace just got almost 1/3 cost of a hussar, exalted or not.
    2. haha, if skirms have 1.5 ROF? but guess what, they dont have it, so dont compare units that have nothing to do with with you are comparing, and either modify the units you compare with...

    Now compare a strelet to a mace...

    o wait, better I will do it...

    Strelet:

    90 HP, 4.5 speed, 30 RR, 60 cost, 10 attack, 3.0 ROF, and 14 range.

    Macehualtin:

    80 HP, 4.5 speed, 30 RR, 70 cost, 8 attack, 1.5 ROF, and 16 range...

    The mace got slightly more cost, less HP and less attack, but it also fires twice fast than a strelet, so its like if it had 15 of attack... But since the strelet costs 50 food and 10 wood, and the mace costs 40 food and 30 wood, and you get wood slower, its all fair and balanced.
     


    Conclusion, both units are fine and dont need any change.

     

    i sound like a noob? im better than u, thats cause i dont spend 50000 hours writing on forums for 4000 posts and spend the time on playing the game


    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫҉ ‭

    Q u o t e:
    school

    Q u o t e:
    fail


    two words that were destined to be together.
    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫ ‭‫
  •  05-15-2008, 10:44 PM 693761 in reply to 693733
    yohomes yohomes is not online. Last active: 09-28-2008, 3:15 PM
    Member
    Straight-Up-G
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 287
    Last Post: 09-28-2008
    Member Since: 04-30-2008
    Subject: Re: Macehaultins r bad
    Иван Грозный:

    no offense, but you sound like a total noob.

    1. Still, a mace just got almost 1/3 cost of a hussar, exalted or not.
    2. haha, if skirms have 1.5 ROF? but guess what, they dont have it, so dont compare units that have nothing to do with with you are comparing, and either modify the units you compare with...

    Now compare a strelet to a mace...

    o wait, better I will do it...

    Strelet:

    90 HP, 4.5 speed, 30 RR, 60 cost, 10 attack, 3.0 ROF, and 14 range.

    Macehualtin:

    80 HP, 4.5 speed, 30 RR, 70 cost, 8 attack, 1.5 ROF, and 16 range...

    The mace got slightly more cost, less HP and less attack, but it also fires twice fast than a strelet, so its like if it had 15 of attack... But since the strelet costs 50 food and 10 wood, and the mace costs 40 food and 30 wood, and you get wood slower, its all fair and balanced.
     


    Conclusion, both units are fine and dont need any change.

     

    i sound like a noob? im better than u, thats cause i dont spend 50000 hours writing on forums for 4000 posts and spend the time on playing the game


    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫҉ ‭

    Q u o t e:
    school

    Q u o t e:
    fail


    two words that were destined to be together.
    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫ ‭‫