AOE3 Forums


  advanced
in


Last post 07-14-2008, 8:38 PM by Mattzc7. 20 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (21 items)   1 2 Next >
Sort Posts:
  •  07-06-2008, 11:11 PM 717927
    yohomes yohomes is not online. Last active: 07-11-2008, 9:53 PM
    Member
    Straight-Up-G
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 277
    Last Post: 07-11-2008
    Member Since: 04-30-2008
    Subject: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)

    OK no flaming in this post, I'm being serious.

     

        I have two civilizations which I really like, the portugese and the British (this is for treaty if any of u sup players come over here u can give sup advice also cause i do play that sometimes).  I can't tell which is better.  The ports musketeers and RI units are better than the british, but the british has better hussar and i think falconets are better than organ guns also.  So, which civilization would you guys advise me to use? 


    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫҉ ‭

    Q u o t e:
    school

    Q u o t e:
    fail


    two words that were destined to be together.
    ‭‫‭‫ ‭‫ ‭‫
  •  07-07-2008, 12:12 AM 717961 in reply to 717927
    representin_gbg representin_gbg is not online. Last active: 07-09-2008, 3:34 PM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 16
    Last Post: 07-09-2008
    Member Since: 07-06-2008
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)

    if the Brits have better Hussars then you may wanna try a REAL civ!

    j/k depends on your play style. not sure bout ports but brits seem to be good at musket spam and artilery backup. 

  •  07-07-2008, 12:13 AM 717962 in reply to 717927
    Solmyr Solmyr is not online. Last active: 08-24-2008, 1:16 PM
    Member
    Germany
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 28
    Last Post: 08-24-2008
    Member Since: 07-09-2007
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)

    i would say portugese, because they are just good, and they also have a pretty good eco.

    but it would also be nice to play british because they are pretty much fun to play and there are not to much player playing british often. btw their musks are very good 

     


  •  07-07-2008, 12:42 AM 717979 in reply to 717927
    Karanthus Karanthus is not online. Last active: 08-29-2008, 3:44 PM
    Member
    Moldgedus World
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 221
    Last Post: 08-29-2008
    Member Since: 07-01-2007
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)
    well there both good kinda the organ gun is like a miny vulcan on wheels and the muskateers are both pretty good but the british have a lot of upgrades for musks/grenades and grenades own the ports infantry and hussars can kill their little gadget on wheels and valconets do less area damage then organs

    .........
  •  07-07-2008, 7:10 AM 718071 in reply to 717979
    razdds2 razdds2 is not online. Last active: 08-30-2008, 7:01 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 18
    Last Post: 08-30-2008
    Member Since: 07-07-2008
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)
    well the brits are at a bit of a disadvantage when it comes to anti-HI, but the ports have their cassadors.  take that into mind. 
  •  07-07-2008, 10:52 AM 718131 in reply to 718071
    dutchmaina_cl dutchmaina_cl is not online. Last active: 07/13/2008, 9:26 AM
    Member
    The Head Godfather
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 481
    Last Post: 07-13-2008
    Member Since: 03-24-2007
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)
    LOL, ok..........The yomen card makes the longbows of the best skirm units in the game. British muskets are better than the ports and their hussars are better. The only thing the ports have over the brits is faster training art. and long ranged mortars.


  •  07-07-2008, 12:14 PM 718160 in reply to 718131
    razdds2 razdds2 is not online. Last active: 08-30-2008, 7:01 AM
    Member
    Not Ranked
    Total Posts: 18
    Last Post: 08-30-2008
    Member Since: 07-07-2008
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)
    you do know that longbows cost wood right, and late game wood isnt easy to get. that is why i said the brits lack a real skirm, because once that wood is out you have nothing, and factories dont make wood fast enough to produce longbows
  •  07-07-2008, 12:20 PM 718163 in reply to 718160
    Barack Obama Barack Obama is online. Last active: 08-30-2008, 9:54 AM
    Member
    The White House
    Top 25 Contributor
    Total Posts: 3,804
    Last Post: 08-30-2008
    Member Since: 02-22-2008
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)

    Go for Ports imo, the economic micro required for the Brits to truly play competitively is staggering and should only be attempted by the best of players. Ports eco is easier to manage thanks to the TCs with age up, and tbh the military is about equal to Brits. Guerrieros, Genitours and Rabaulds are a good all purpose combination, genitours are basically cav skirms with that great range and can deal shedloads of damage to other cav, Genitours are a good meatshield and will stop any other cav getting to the organ guns, which will slaughter infantry better than a falc tbh. Once ur winning, build fbs are get some more artillery up, culvs can be useful, but the emphasis on sieging with Ports is Guerrieros, Genitours and Mortars.

     


    Why is it that whenever someone decides to run for president, everyone suddenly thinks hes rubbish? Crying
  •  07-07-2008, 12:25 PM 718164 in reply to 718160
    Barack Obama Barack Obama is online. Last active: 08-30-2008, 9:54 AM
    Member
    The White House
    Top 25 Contributor
    Total Posts: 3,804
    Last Post: 08-30-2008
    Member Since: 02-22-2008
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)

    razdds2:
    you do know that longbows cost wood right, and late game wood isnt easy to get. that is why i said the brits lack a real skirm, because once that wood is out you have nothing, and factories dont make wood fast enough to produce longbows

    True, but if u play a 2v2 with Frenchies, u livestock boom and give them 100k food, then they fur trade and give u 100k coin, then u south sea boom and get 125k wood. This should be enough considering u can buy over 3000 longbows with that Stick out tongue


    Why is it that whenever someone decides to run for president, everyone suddenly thinks hes rubbish? Crying
  •  07-07-2008, 4:41 PM 718246 in reply to 718164
    dutchmaina_cl dutchmaina_cl is not online. Last active: 07/13/2008, 9:26 AM
    Member
    The Head Godfather
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 481
    Last Post: 07-13-2008
    Member Since: 03-24-2007
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)
    the answer to not enough wood is called the South Sea Bubble, look into it.


  •  07-07-2008, 5:47 PM 718277 in reply to 718131
    Dwarph Dwarph is not online. Last active: 08-30-2008, 9:12 AM
    Member
    Top 500 Contributor
    Total Posts: 231
    Last Post: 08-30-2008
    Member Since: 12-16-2007
    Subject: Re: Which Is Better? (NO FLAMING)

    dutchmaina_cl:
    LOL, ok..........The yomen card makes the longbows of the best skirm units in the game. British muskets are better than the ports and their hussars are better. The only thing the ports have over the brits is faster training art. and long ranged mortars.

    Don't ports have better goons too? I think they do, but seeing as I don't play brits and prots often enough I wouldn't know. As for artillery, falconets are better than organ guns even if they do train slower.



  •  07-07-2008, 6:00 PM 718282 in reply to 718277