|
|
Last post 11-11-2009, 5:38 PM by carlos72. 112 replies.
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
india vs. Germany
Any thoughts guys?
Assume that both players are highly skilled with the given civilizations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: india vs. Germany
i never would have thought......so the order of best non-op is
Ports
China
India
then Gemrany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: india vs. Germany
Rezarecshun:Any thoughts guys? Assume that both players are highly skilled with the given civilizations
Taunt 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: india vs. Germany
WTF Sunil, why u keep doing that?
Anyways, you can just put siege eles in the middle of sepoys and that would conpensate for its low range, but culverins wouls still own them. But why would ES make siege eles have 300 more HP, less attack, and less attack than a mortar. I remember the frst time i used India and i thought siege eles were cannons, and i gave up like 30 pop just to make 5 to counter the massed infantry of the Russian player against.....wat a bad idea that was......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: india vs. Germany
Rezarecshun:WTF Sunil, why u keep doing that?
Taunt 21 Rezarecshun: Anyways, you can just put siege eles in the middle of sepoys and that would conpensate for its low range, but culverins wouls still own them. But why would ES make siege eles have 300 more HP, less attack, and less attack than a mortar. I remember the frst time i used India and i thought siege eles were cannons, and i gave up like 30 pop just to make 5 to counter the massed infantry of the Russian player against.....wat a bad idea that was......
you got mahout vs *LI and gurkha/urumi/sepoy which does fine vs HI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: india vs. Germany
alanspunks:india allday long sepoy and howdah it's game over, advantage for india that german have slow artillery train time
man what are you talking about. on andes at 40 india is much more powerfull because of over pop tactics that all asian civs are very good at. delete 50 vills and germany will own india. of coarse india has the better units, similar issues with pop space but imo germany>india once the cards get sent. indias xp gathering gives them a clear cut advatage at 40 min but ive seen in the past, if germany can get a trade route post its much more even and germany wins. cannon lame.
i think i posted a recording of german vs india last week at trt site. the nub didnt use natives so he had no chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
-
 |
|
 |
|
Subject:
Re: india vs. Germany
BuZz_D: alanspunks:india allday long sepoy and howdah it's game over, advantage for india that german have slow artillery train time
man what are you talking about. on andes at 40 india is much more powerfull because of over pop tactics that all asian civs are very good at. delete 50 vills and germany will own india. of coarse india has the better units, similar issues with pop space but imo germany>india once the cards get sent. indias xp gathering gives them a clear cut advatage at 40 min but ive seen in the past, if germany can get a trade route post its much more even and germany wins. cannon lame.
i think i posted a recording of german vs india last week at trt site. the nub didnt use natives so he had no chance.
had no chance... he still gave a good game even without indians lol and imo should of won that game but he didnt take advantage. if u wanan delete 50 vill u go ahead and do that but u should be deleting 50 vills with germany anyways lol?, its not hard to just delete 10-20 vills with india if need be, there eco si good enough to manage without them . cannons just doesnt work with germany against india because of the slow train time plus push 1 or 2 howdahs up and they will take care of them np at all , but i guess u no best. u always seen to come back at me like i dont no what im talking about , yet u never proven nothing to me , u talk a good game thats about it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Page 1 of 8 (113 items)
1 ...
|
|
|